Yuv wrote:
On Nov 8, 1:33 am, Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the docstring expected to be formatted according to some
convention?
We tried to comply to PEP 257 and we're open to suggestions on this.
I'd suggest at the very least supporting Sphinx docstrings that have the
This was posted to the argparse mailing list by Steven Bethard and now
we'd like some feedback from comp.lang.python.
We now have a branch[5] of argparse that supports an ``argparse.run``
function[6] which does
some function introspection to build a command line parser from a
function definition:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Yuv ubershme...@gmail.com wrote:
This was posted to the argparse mailing list by Steven Bethard and now
we'd like some feedback from comp.lang.python.
We now have a branch[5] of argparse that supports an ``argparse.run``
function[6] which does
some function
On Nov 7, 2:45 pm, Yuv ubershme...@gmail.com wrote:
This was posted to the argparse mailing list by Steven Bethard and now
we'd like some feedback from comp.lang.python.
We now have a branch[5] of argparse that supports an ``argparse.run``
function[6] which does
some function introspection
On Nov 8, 1:33 am, Carl Banks pavlovevide...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the docstring expected to be formatted according to some
convention?
Yes it does, we parse the docstring as explained in argparse.py:
def _parse_docstring(function):
Parses a function's docstring for a description of the
