On 13 Jun 2010 18:23:28 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
What's your cite that URLs never end with a period? AFAIK, that's
perfectly valid by the rules.
Technically that may be true but when do you ever see one? If your
email client discards trailing periods I think you can expect it
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com writes:
You know, I've never been a part of a community in which the URL
format was the most contentious part of filing a bug report.
Heck no, the bug report is already filed, and
In article mailman.1348.1276386991.32709.python-l...@python.org,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs. That period is a valid
URL character, but it's invalid for this URL, and it's not obvious to
On Jun 13, 12:56 am, geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-06-12 17:49 , geremy condra wrote:
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
an OverflowError: math range error. This is
On 13 Jun 2010 09:49:03 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs. That period is a valid
URL character, but it's invalid for this URL, and it's not obvious to the
reader whether the period should be
In article mailman.1409.1276477866.32709.python-l...@python.org,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@druid.net wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010 09:49:03 -0700
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs. That period is a valid
URL character, but it's invalid for this URL, and
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
In article mailman.1348.1276386991.32709.python-l...@python.org,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
Please don't put extraneous punctuation on URLs.
The punctuation isn't extraneous; it's a necessary
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
In article mailman.1348.1276386991.32709.python-l...@python.org,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
Bug filed, http://bugs.python.org/issue8986.
Please don't put
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:05:28 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) writes:
In article mailman.1348.1276386991.32709.python-l...@python.org,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com wrote:
Bug filed,
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com writes:
You know, I've never been a part of a community in which the URL
format was the most contentious part of filing a bug report.
Heck no, the bug report is already filed, and contentions about the bug
report should presumably be going into that report.
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
stage: - unit test needed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8986
___
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8986
___
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the report. What platform are you on? I'm not seeing this
behaviour on OS X:
Python 3.2a0 (py3k:81935M, Jun 12 2010, 10:01:38)
[GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5659)] on darwin
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8986
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Geremy, can you verify that the attached patch fixes the problem? If so, I'll
add tests and commit.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17654/issue8986.patch
___
Python
geremy condra debat...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Mark Dickinson rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Geremy, can you verify that the attached patch fixes the problem? If so,
I'll add tests and commit.
I've
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r81967 (trunk) and r81968 (py3k).
I had to weaken the tests for erfc: its accuracy for largish arguments (25.0
or so) is not ideal---I was seeing errors of 100 ulps and more. However, I
think this level of error is acceptable in
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
erfc function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well as with the C99
function by the same name, both of which return 2. I suspect that
this is the result of the
On 2010-06-12 17:49 , geremy condra wrote:
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
erfc function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well as with the C99
function by the same name, both of which return
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-06-12 17:49 , geremy condra wrote:
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises
an OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the
erfc function from scipy
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:49:37 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises an
OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the erfc
function from scipy (scipy.special.erfc) as well as with the C99
function by the same name, both
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Steven D'Aprano
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:49:37 -0700, geremy condra wrote:
In Python3.2, calling math.erfc with a value in [-27.2, -30) raises an
OverflowError: math range error. This is inconsistent with the erfc
of which return 2. I suspect that
this is the result of the cutoff for the use of the continuing fraction
approximation of erfc beginning when abs(x) 30, but I'm not sure.
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 107718
nosy: debatem1
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: math.erfc
23 matches
Mail list logo
