Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If you want iterator operations similar to itertools, why does this
mean you need to replace anything? Just create your own iterators.
Or use pre-processing and post-processing to get what you want.
Can you show an example of what you would like to happen?
Steven,
Christian Heimes wrote:
If you *really* need to overwrite __iter__ on your instance rather
than defining it on your class, you need to proxy the method call:
class MyObject(object):
def __iter__(self):
return self.myiter()
obj = MyObject()
obj.myiter = myiter
That should
Martin Drautzburg wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If you want iterator operations similar to itertools, why does this
mean you need to replace anything? Just create your own iterators.
Or use pre-processing and post-processing to get what you want.
Can you show an example of what you would
Steve Holden wrote:
y = s1*2 + s2(align=10)
which should iterate as
Time=1,'a'
Time=2,'a'
Time=10,'b'
I have no difficulty passing align to the object (using __call__)
and use it while I furnish my own __iter__() method. However I don't
quite see how I can do this with bare
Martin Drautzburg wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
y = s1*2 + s2(align=10)
which should iterate as
Time=1,'a'
Time=2,'a'
Time=10,'b'
I have no difficulty passing align to the object (using __call__)
and use it while I furnish my own __iter__() method. However I don't
quite see how I can
Hello all
When I create an Object and set its __iter__ method from outside
s = Sequence #one of my own classes
s.__iter__ = new.instancemethod(f,s,Sequence)
I get different results, depending on whether I call
for x in y.__iter__():
print x
or
for x in y:
print x
The first case
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:53:53 +0100, Martin Drautzburg wrote:
Hello all
When I create an Object and set its __iter__ method from outside
s = Sequence #one of my own classes
s.__iter__ = new.instancemethod(f,s,Sequence)
I'm confused as to why you are aliasing your class before changing it.
Martin Drautzburg wrote:
The first case does what I expected, i.e. it iterates over whatever f()
yields. In the second case nothing is printed. I have the impression
that it still calls the original __iter__() method (the one defined at
the class level).
Why is that so?
How can I replace
