On Nov 30, 1:03 pm, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
Another thing about the AST, I am having fun trying to for example list
out all
the unused imports.
I have already a visitor which works quite nicely I think, but now I
would like
to get a way to find all the unused imports,
On 12/02/2011 03:18 PM, DevPlayer wrote:
There was another topic in these forums recently about un-importing
modules (and how you can not do that reliably without restarting
python). There was various ways mentioned of keeping track of what was
imported. And there was mentioned reasonable ways
And on a related topic, how can I actually detect other types of
imports, for example
__import__
Doing a dump I get this:
In [113]: ast.dump(ast.parse('__import__(module)'))
Out[113]: Module(body=[Expr(value=Call(func=Name(id='__import__',
ctx=Load()), args=[Str(s='module')], keywords=[],
On Monday, November 28, 2011 7:45:57 PM UTC+8, Andrea Crotti wrote:
I'm happily using the ast module to analyze some code,
but my scripts need also to run unfortunately on python 2.5
The _ast was there already, but the ast helpers not yet.
Is it ok if I just copy over the source from the ast
an indexed array with (k,v) pairs for k=0,1,2,3...n in
a trivial way.
What in the world does any of this have to do with using the ast
module in Python 2.5? I am starting to suspect that 8 Dihedral
may be a bot.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Another thing about the AST, I am having fun trying to for example list
out all
the unused imports.
I have already a visitor which works quite nicely I think, but now I
would like
to get a way to find all the unused imports, so I need more visitors that
find out all the used names.
I didn't
On 11/29/2011 03:55 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
But don't forget to tag it as version specific, so it gets removed
when the later version of the library is available. There are various
ways of doing that, but the easiest is probably to put a test in the
acceptance suite that fails if this code is
On 29 November 2011 09:51, Andrea Crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com wrote:
from sys import version_info
if version_info[1] == 5:
from psi.devsonly.ast import parse, NodeVisitor
else:
from ast import parse, NodeVisitor
Why don't you just:
try:
from ast import parse, NodeVisitor
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:51:24 +, Andrea Crotti wrote:
On 11/29/2011 03:55 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
But don't forget to tag it as version specific, so it gets removed when
the later version of the library is available. There are various ways
of doing that, but the easiest is probably to put
On 11/29/2011 11:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I prefer to check against sys.version.
import sys
if sys.version= '2.5':
from psi.devsonly.ast import parse, NodeVisitor
else:
from ast import parse, NodeVisitor
Or even:
try:
from ast import parse, NodeVisitor
except
I'm happily using the ast module to analyze some code,
but my scripts need also to run unfortunately on python 2.5
The _ast was there already, but the ast helpers not yet.
Is it ok if I just copy over the source from the ast helpers in my code base
or is there a smarter way?
(I don't even need
On 11/28/2011 6:45 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
I'm happily using the ast module to analyze some code,
but my scripts need also to run unfortunately on python 2.5
The _ast was there already, but the ast helpers not yet.
Is it ok if I just copy over the source from the ast helpers in my code
base
On 11/28/2011 03:08 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 11/28/2011 6:45 AM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
I'm happily using the ast module to analyze some code,
but my scripts need also to run unfortunately on python 2.5
The _ast was there already, but the ast helpers not yet.
Is it ok if I just copy over the
13 matches
Mail list logo
