On 09/23/16 at 01:20am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> If I were doing this, I'd simply have a script that watches the .rst
> file and rebuilds a corresponding output file, which can then be shown
> in another window, completely separate to the editor.
[when-changed]://github.com/joh/when-changed) is a
On 03/30/16 at 09:17pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:12 pm, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
>
> > Steven D'Aprano writes:
> >
> >> Given a surjection (many-to-one mapping)
> >
> > No. And I doubt that Wikipedia says that.
>
>
> No to what? What are you disagreeing with?
>
I think
On 03/30/16 at 01:40pm, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> Manolo Martínez writes:
>
> > I think it's with your definition of surjection. Bijections are
> > surjective, no?
>
> Yes, and most many-to-one mappings are *not* surjective.
Well, I don't know about most, the
On 03/30/16 at 02:44pm, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Jussi Piitulainen :
>
> > Manolo Martínez writes:
> >> On 03/30/16 at 01:40pm, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> >>> Yes, and most many-to-one mappings are *not* surjective.
> >>
> >> Well, I don'
On 03/30/16 at 03:55pm, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Manolo Martínez :
>
> > On 03/30/16 at 02:44pm, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> >> I don't even know if you can say much about the cardinality (or
> >> countability) of mappings. The general set of mappings can't
On 04/06/16 at 08:59pm, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> 2016-04-05 20:35 GMT-04:00 majoxd hola :
> > me podrían enviar el programa Python spyder para Windows?
> >
> This is an english language list. And besides, your question I could
> send the Python program spyder for Windows? is awfully vague
They a
On 05/02/16 at 11:24am, Larry Martell wrote:
> That reminds me of something I heard many years ago.
>
> Every non-trivial program can be simplified by at least one line of code.
> Every non trivial program has at least one bug.
>
> Therefore every non-trivial program can be reduced to one line of
(off-list) successful abstracts submitted to other editions of this or
similar conferences? Also, perhaps, general resources that I should read
before responding to a computer science CFP? That would be extremely
helpful.
Thanks in advance. Best,
Manolo Martínez
Universitat de Barcel
On 2019-04-17, DL Neil wrote:
> 2. When the program can still do something useful (if perhaps
> feature-limited) without the imported module by substituting
> something else in its place.
Isn't this a very common scenario, similar to what package management systems
call "optional de
On 12/01/15 at 12:00pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm trying to understand why vars() exists. Does anyone use it?
Well, I have this little podcast aggregator
(https://github.com/manolomartinez/greg) that I and a bunch of other
people use. I started writing it some years ago, and the code is a bit
o
Peter, thanks for taking the time to look into my code.
On 12/01/15 at 11:40am, Peter Otten wrote:
> Manolo Martínez wrote:
> > def main(): # parse the args and call whatever function was
> selected
> > try:
> > args = pars
On 12/01/15 at 06:47pm, Peter Otten wrote:
> Extract 2D arrays:
>
> >>> a[:,2,3]
> array([[ 55, 56, 57, 58, 59],
>[115, 116, 117, 118, 119]])
> >>> a[1,:,2]
> array([[ 70, 71, 72, 73, 74],
>[ 90, 91, 92, 93, 94],
>[110, 111, 112, 113, 114]])
The first one is eq
Dear Peter, and Steven, thanks again for engaging with my script. I'm
fully aware that this is not the tutor mailing list :)
Peter Otten wrote:
> As far as I can see in a correctly written script the AttributeError cannot
> be triggered by the user as argparse handles this case automatically by
On 12/02/15 at 08:33pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
> > This... is true. I could have sworn that's not the way argparse behaved
> > when I wrote that snippet, but I've been very wrong before about similar
> > things. Anywa
On 03/23/16 at 03:06am, Heli wrote:
> I have a 2D numpy array like this:
>
> [[1,2,3,4],
> [1,2,3,4],
> [1,2,3,4]
> [1,2,3,4]]
>
> Is there any fast way to convert this array to
>
> [[1,1,1,1],
> [2,2,2,2]
> [3,3,3,3]
> [4,4,4,4]]
You don't mean just transposing your original array, as
On 11/10/14 at 09:00pm, Grant Edwards wrote:
> That's the saddest troll I've seen in ages.
That, on the other hand, is a pretty decent bit of trolling.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 03/02/15 at 08:59am, alister wrote:
> or as another analogy why don't you (Marco) try telling a Barber in
> Seville that he should be speaking Latin Spanish not that strange
> variation he uses?
>
> I suspect the reaction you get will be far more severe than the one you
> are getting from
On 03/20/15 at 01:46pm, Mr. Twister wrote:
> I have two numpy arrays:
>
> >>> P
> array([[[ 2, 3],
> [33, 44],
> [22, 11],
> [ 1, 2]]])
> >>> R
> array([0, 1, 2, 3])
>
> the values of these may of course be different. The important fact is that:
>
> >>> P.shape
> (1,
On 03/20/15 at 02:11pm, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 03/20/15 at 01:46pm, Mr. Twister wrote:
>
> > I have two numpy arrays:
[...]
> > Is there a direct, single expression command to get this result?
>
> I think that you want
>
> P * R[;,None]
Sorr
On 04/22/15 at 07:25pm, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I thought there was a Python shell that could be used instead of Bash
> (or whichever shell you are using)
Perhaps you had [xonsh](http://xonsh.org/) in mind?
Manolo
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 09/06/14 at 08:38pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> But even that's not how the specialists do it. If you want to check whether
> (say) 2**3000+1 is prime, you don't want to use trial division at all...
When I was interested in these things, specialists would use the [number
field sieve](https://en.w
On 09/07/14 at 06:53pm, Peter Pearson wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:53:16 +0200, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> > On 09/06/14 at 08:38pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> But even that's not how the specialists do it. If you want to check whether
> >> (say) 2**3000+1
22 matches
Mail list logo
