On May 25, 3:14 pm, John Bokma j...@castleamber.com wrote:
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us writes:
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/25/2011 8:01 AM, John Bokma wrote:
to. Like I already stated before: if Python is really so much better
than Python readability wise, why do I have such a hard time
On May 26, 5:33 pm, Daniel Kluev dan.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Octavian Rasnita orasn...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again. Suppose we have array of key-value pairs (two-dimensional
array),
This is a forced example to fit the way Python can do it with a clean
Hi, in python 3.4.1, I get this surpising behaviour:
l=Loc(0,0)
l2=Loc(1,1)
ll2
False
ll2
True
l=l2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: unorderable types: Loc() = Loc()
l==l2
False
ll2 or l==l2
True
Loc implements both __lt__ and __eq__, which
On Monday, June 30, 2014 3:34:25 PM UTC-4, Peter Otten wrote:
RainyDay wrote:
Hi, in python 3.4.1, I get this surpising behaviour:
l=Loc(0,0)
l2=Loc(1,1)
ll2
False
ll2
True
l=l2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
On Jan 10, 6:37 am, Νικόλαος Κούρας nikos.kou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 Ιαν, 12:57, Thomas Rachel nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-
a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de wrote:
Am 10.01.2012 10:02 schrieb Νικόλαος Κούρας:
---
| HOST |
