On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 2015-02-12 17:35, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
reasons
the Python-dev gang
On 12/02/2015 19:16, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 2015-02-12 17:35, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one
On 2015-02-12 17:35, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions 9. There
are too many similar
On 2015-02-12 12:16, Ian Kelly wrote:
It still becomes an issue when we get to Python 10.
Just call it Python X! :-)
Things break down again when we get to Python XIX.
'XVIII' 'XIX'
False
You know what this sub-thread gives me? The icks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DzfPcSysAg
On 2/12/2015 11:16 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
Things break down again when we get to Python XIX.
'XVIII' 'XIX'
False
Looks to me like you better check if your PEP313 patch is installed
properly. :)
Emile
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Skip Montanaro wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
reasons the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions
9. There are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in
the real world.
Which is why there will be no Windows
On 2015-02-12 17:45, Gisle Vanem wrote:
I tried using Interactive Python with a PyQt4 console:
IPython.exe qtconsole
But got a
ImportError: IPython requires PyQT4 = 4.7, found 4.10.4
Looking at Ipython's check (in
site-packages\IPython\external\qt.py): if QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the
reasons the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions
9. There are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in the
real world.
Skip
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Gisle Vanem gva...@yahoo.no wrote:
I tried using Interactive Python with a PyQt4 console:
IPython.exe qtconsole
But got a
ImportError: IPython requires PyQT4 = 4.7, found 4.10.4
Looking at Ipython's check (in site-packages\IPython\external\qt.py):
if
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Gisle Vanem gva...@yahoo.no wrote:
Looking at Ipython's check (in site-packages\IPython\external\qt.py):
if QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR '4.7':
raise ImportError(IPython requires PyQt4 = 4.7, found
%s%QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR)
So even if '4.10' '4.7', my
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions 9. There
are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this sort of lexicographical comparison wart is one of the reasons
the Python-dev gang decided that there would be no micro versions 9. There
are too many similar assumptions about version numbers out in
Tim Chase wrote: So the test should actually be something like
if LooseVersion(QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR) LooseVersion(4.10):
balk()
That's exactly what they do now in IPython/utils/version.py with
the comment:
Utilities for version comparison
It is a bit ridiculous that we need
On 2015-02-12 18:37, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Tim Chase wrote: So the test should actually be something like
if LooseVersion(QtCore.PYQT_VERSION_STR)
LooseVersion(4.10): balk()
That's exactly what they do now in IPython/utils/version.py with
the comment:
Utilities for version
14 matches
Mail list logo
