On 19/12/12 18:11:37, Kwnstantinos Euaggelidis wrote:
> I have this code for Prime Numbers and i want to do it with Threads..
> Any idea.??
Why would you want to do that?
It's not going to be any faster, since your code is CPU-bound.
You may have several CPUs, but CPython is going to use only one
On 12/19/2012 12:11 PM, Kwnstantinos Euaggelidis wrote:
> I have this code for Prime Numbers and i want to do it with Threads.. Any
> idea.??
Why do you want to do it with threads? Is it to speed up the
processing? (Guessing that partly because of your printing "elapsed
time." Chances are runni
Negoescu Constantin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I know that Python is */not fully threadsafe/*. Unlike Java, where
> threading was considered to be so important that it is a part of the
> syntax, in Python threads were laid down at the altar of Portability.
> But, i really have to finish a projec
Stephan Popp wrote:
> I've got a problem with stopping python-threads.
> I'm starting a thread with twisteds reactor.deferToThread which start a
> methodcall in a seperate thread. In this thread a swig-wrapped c++ module is
> running.
> Now I want to stop the running thread from the main thread
You cannot really do that*. Use a flag or something that the thread
checks if it should shut down.
/Simon
* well actually you can, sort of by using
int PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc( long id, PyObject *exc) from C API.
However, if you do that you swap one problem for a sh*tload of others,
because of
