Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Barry Warsaw writes:
> > On Jan 18, 2009, at 11:47 AM, s...@pobox.com wrote:
> >
> > > I'm going to stop pretending I'm contributing anything to python-mode
> > > development.
>
> Heh. In my book, just making an announcement that you're definitely
> going to be i
>> > but I'm sure with the current thrust to see where python.el and
>> > python-mode.el can be merged there will be changes to be made there
>> > in the near future.
Stephen> I haven't seen much of that on xemacs-beta, so I presume that
Stephen> has come from the GNU Emacs si
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 11:47 AM, s...@pobox.com wrote:
>
> > I'm going to stop pretending I'm contributing anything to python-mode
> > development.
Heh. In my book, just making an announcement that you're definitely
going to be inactive in the future is a contribution!
I
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
>
>> I didn't sign code to FSF and probably will not. The reasons I already
>> declared on
>> FSF-list and towards RMS.
>
> Do you have a pointer to that discussion?
>
Raised my concerns at several occasions. The most com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 19, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Andreas Roehler wrote:
I didn't sign code to FSF and probably will not. The reasons I
already declared on
FSF-list and towards RMS.
Do you have a pointer to that discussion?
Will not make it up here, unless you ask
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Dave Love wrote:
>
>> There is talk in the python-mode.el and on the web site of merging it
>> with python.el. I hope people realize that can only be done in
>> accordance with the GPL licence of python.el -- i.e. one way -- although
>> it doesn'
Dave Love wrote:
> There is talk in the python-mode.el and on the web site of merging it
> with python.el. I hope people realize that can only be done in
> accordance with the GPL licence of python.el -- i.e. one way -- although
> it doesn't seem useful anyhow.
Hi Dave,
I'm glad to see your pos
