Am 24.09.2013 08:45, schrieb Diez B. Roggisch:
On Sep 23, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Andreas Röhler <andreas.roeh...@online.de> wrote:
Hi Barry, hi all,
there was an expample at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18940719/python-indentation-with-emacs/18940836#18940836
if 1 < 2:
print("this line is part of the if statement")
print("this is NOT part of the if statement")
The OP wanted the Editor intends the second "print" to column 0.
IMO it's possibly establishing an edit rule saying: if an empty line follows a
block, consider this block closed.
Now seeing the example below at
http://pyvideo.org/video/1708/distributed-coordination-with-python
def find(seq, target):
for i, value in enumerate(seq):
if value == tgt:
break
else:
return -1
return i
If an empty line after "break" is inserted:
def find(seq, target):
for i, value in enumerate(seq):
if value == tgt:
break
else:
return -1
return i
That would allow to calulate the "else:" to column 4 right away.
Also for me it's slightly better readable.
Question: Would you welcome such an edit-style or rather discourage?
If it's optional, and initially off, I wouldn't mind.
Would be off by default.
BTW if enabled, C-j than would keep indent at first step.
A second C-j would leave that empty line empty but re-calculate if it should
dedent now after that new rule.
_______________________________________________
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
