Re: [Python-mode] OT: web-based color theme creator

2010-03-22 Thread Deniz Dogan
2010/3/22 Jeff Bauer : > If you like to tweak your color themes, check this out: > >  http://alexpogosyan.com/color-theme-creator/ > > Jeff Bauer > Rubicon, Inc. > ___ > Python-mode mailing list > Python-mode@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/li

Re: [Python-mode] Don't bind C-c C-h

2010-03-22 Thread Andreas Roehler
Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mar 21, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Andreas Roehler wrote: > >> Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 05:12 PM, Reinout van Rees wrote: >>> On 03/19/2010 04:21 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Any objections to C-c C-e? None at all. That e-for-explain you mentioned sou

[Python-mode] Towards a PDEE

2010-03-22 Thread Andreas Roehler
Hi Barry, hello list, as the colors themes matter indicates, idea of an integrated python developing environment meets some wider interest. Which raises the question where to proceed. Integrating more stuff might result into an collection like emacs-w3m. BTW if entered that path, suggest a spl

Re: [Python-mode] OT: web-based color theme creator

2010-03-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote: > 2010/3/22 Jeff Bauer : >> If you like to tweak your color themes, check this out: >> >> http://alexpogosyan.com/color-theme-creator/ > Brilliant! Indeed! Even though I'm happy with my colors, this is a very cool site. Thanks Shawn . -Barry __

Re: [Python-mode] Towards a PDEE

2010-03-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Andreas Roehler wrote: >as the colors themes matter indicates, idea of an >integrated python developing environment meets some >wider interest. > >Which raises the question where to proceed. I'm probably not the best person to participate in this. While I definitely

Re: [Python-mode] Towards a PDEE

2010-03-22 Thread Andreas Roehler
Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Andreas Roehler wrote: > >> as the colors themes matter indicates, idea of an >> integrated python developing environment meets some >> wider interest. >> >> Which raises the question where to proceed. > > I'm probably not the best person to par