Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-06 Thread Glenn Morris
Stefan Monnier wrote: > The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I remember. For example, Andreas Roehler has issues with copyright assignments: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-03/msg00029.html Besides that, in 2008 an attempt was made to make a list of

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-06 Thread Christoph Scholtes
Hi Andreas, On 3/30/2011 8:10 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote: glad to see Emacs python facilities improve. As you mention python-mode.el, there are some remarks in python.el which I feel are not correct. If some solution predates historically another, there are usually some setbacks from being the fi

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-05 Thread Stefan Monnier
Please don't reply on this list. Stefan > "Andreas" == Andreas Röhler writes: > Am 05.04.2011 00:24, schrieb Glenn Morris: >> Stefan Monnier wrote: >> >>> The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I remember. >> >> For example, Andreas Roehler has issues with

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Andreas Röhler
Am 05.04.2011 00:24, schrieb Glenn Morris: Stefan Monnier wrote: The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I remember. For example, Andreas Roehler has issues with copyright assignments: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-03/msg00029.html So it is. My

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread skip
>> The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I >> remember. Barry> Is there a way to check specifically? I'm sure we could get Barry> Skip, Tim, and Ken to sign papers if necessary. I have also volunteered relatively recently (within the last couple months)

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 04, 2011, at 05:46 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> ;; That isn't covered by an FSF copyright assignment (?), unlike this >>> ;; code, and seems not to be well-maintained for Emacs (though I've >>> ;; submitted fixes). > >> I've said before, but it's worth repeating. While I still believe tha

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> ;; That isn't covered by an FSF copyright assignment (?), unlike this >> ;; code, and seems not to be well-maintained for Emacs (though I've >> ;; submitted fixes). > I've said before, but it's worth repeating. While I still believe that at > some point I did sign a copyright assignment for my

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 03, 2011, at 08:55 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote: >;; That isn't covered by an FSF copyright assignment (?), unlike this >;; code, and seems not to be well-maintained for Emacs (though I've >;; submitted fixes). I've said before, but it's worth repeating. While I still believe that at some poi

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Stefan Monnier
> ;; That isn't covered by an FSF copyright assignment (?), IIUC this is still the case (and historically it's the main reason why it's not been included in Emacs). > ;; unlike this ;; code, and seems not to be well-maintained for Emacs > (though I've ;; submitted fixes). Indeed, it is better to

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-03 Thread Andreas Röhler
Am 03.04.2011 19:45, schrieb Christoph Scholtes: Hi Andreas, On 3/30/2011 8:10 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote: glad to see Emacs python facilities improve. As you mention python-mode.el, there are some remarks in python.el which I feel are not correct. If some solution predates historically another,

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-03-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
Thanks for CC'ing me. I'm now subscribed to emacs-devel via Gmane. On Mar 30, 2011, at 04:10 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote: >glad to see Emacs python facilities improve. As you mention python-mode.el, >there are some remarks in python.el which I feel are not correct. If some >solution predates histor

Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-03-30 Thread Andreas Röhler
Am 30.03.2011 04:58, schrieb Christoph Scholtes: Stefan Monnier writes: Could you just clarify why they're considered obsolete (e.g. what would the user use instead)? `python-shell' is not needed since Dave's mode already had 'run-python' to invoke the python interpreter. It offers no advant