Package: python3-commonmark-bkrs
Version: 0.5.4+ds-4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The watch file of the package points to the old repository
(rolandshoemaker/CommonMark-py):
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/commonmark-
bkrs/blob/master/debian/watch
But that repository clearly
Package: python3-pylint-django
Version: 2.0.11-1
Severity: wishlist
As explained in #945426, pylint 2.4 has removed the unit tests from the package
installation and the test functional classes have only been re-introduced in
the package in pylint 2.5 so for now I'll disable the unit tests and
Hi Matthias,
I was surprised to receive this mail as I thought that migration had
already been done but it turns out that the doc package was still
depending on python-doc instead of python3-doc.
I'll upload the new version shortly.
Thanks,
Joseph
Control: tags ! + pending
Control: forwarded ! https://github.com/vinayak-mehta/tablib/pull/374
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks for the report and sorry for the late reply.
I've uploaded the latest version of python-tablib and included your patch.
I also forwarded your patch to upstream to hopefully get it
Hi,
Thanks Scott for the report.
Tomas: the repository in Openstack was archived long ago because it
was ported to https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-tablib
The module is used by other packages than openstack (like
django-tables if I remember correctly), so could you please hold
FYI, the new version of factory-boy is on the ftp-master queue. This
will solve itself in the next few days.
I'll close it once the package reaches testing.
Cheers,
Joseph
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the report.
I was hoping to get a quick answer from
https://github.com/FactoryBoy/factory_boy/issues/552 to push the new
version of factory-boy without patching but I'll probably try to
update the package and add the patch for python 3.7 that has been
already merged so that
Hi Brian,
One of my packages needs factory-boy to be able to run properly (see #918340).
Do you mind if I upload the latest version of factory-boy and add the
subset of the relevant patch that fixes the compatibility with python
3.7? (the part about factory/utils.py in
Note that I'm having trouble with the latest release right now (see
https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint-django/issues/215) so I won't upload
it today.
But I should be able to get that fixed shortly.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
Reading through the changes of 2.0.1 to 2.0.5 of pylint-django, it
seems that this change has already been dealt with in the latest
version.
See:
Control: tags -1 - fixed
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi guys,
Thanks Lucas for the report. Sorry for the late reply, I was out of
the country with very limited internet access.
Thanks Emmanuel for the quick patch.
Notes for next time:
* Please use meaningful commit messages, especially when
Control: reassign -1 python-s3transfer
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/boto/s3transfer/pull/102
Reassigning this bug to python-s3transfer as it is the one that will
be patch to support the missing argument.
Upstream issues:
Hi guys,
FYI I am requesting a new lintian tag to warn about the presence of
the debian/pyversions file as it is supposed to be obsolete since
dh_python2 [1].
According to the policy[2], we are supposed to use the
X-Python3-Version field in debian/control to specify the version now.
Please let
Hi,
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Are we sure it's completely safe to remove it globally?
Also, it's written in the python policy to do so:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Policy
"Another note: if there is a debian/pycompat file, you must launch
Hi,
On Fri, May 11, 2018, 1:10 AM Ondrej Novy wrote:
> no problem, so just remove that file?
>
>
> https://github.com/onovy/onovy-mass/commit/2c24adf1ecd8fc934328f69c75b2b2d9256ee3c9
>
> Are we sure it's completely safe to remove it globally?
>
This file has been deprecated
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:29 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> Removing Python 2 version: <= 2.7 (thus all)
> Removing Python 3 version: <= 3.4 (older than jessie)
>
> Any objections?
Thanks for doing that Ondřej, maybe we could delete the pycompat file
when exists at the same time (in a
I just saw that that there was a discussin on #896429 (I was looking
at #896396).
> I wonder whether we can draw anything useful from these bugs before
> closing them.
>
> For one thing, you cannot use autopkgtest-pkg-python on these modules as is.
> So yeah, for django this may make sense, but
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi
The error message you posted seems pretty explicit: it seems you're
missing some configuration apparently:
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: Requested setting
DEFAULT_INDEX_TABLESPACE, but settings are not
18 matches
Mail list logo