[Python-modules-team] Bug#694296: python-mock-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-mock (<< 0.7.2)

2012-11-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python-mock-doc Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their pack

[Python-modules-team] Bug#694289: python-gdata-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-gdata (<< 2.0.14-2)

2012-11-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: python-gdata-doc Version: 2.0.14-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their pa

[Python-modules-team] Bug#694280: ipython-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: ipython (<< 0.12.1+dfsg)

2012-11-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: ipython-doc Version: 0.12.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their pa

[Python-modules-team] Bug#673790: Status update?

2012-11-24 Thread Dominik George
Hi, I stumvled upon this bug report during the BSP in Essen. What is the current state? I did one obvious test and found that in testing, the example script works. Does this issue still break other packages? Please report un an understandable manner what is still broken and what isn't. -nik

[Python-modules-team] Bug#689285: Not properly fixed

2012-11-24 Thread Enrico Zini
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:47:22PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > I'll do it in a week unless some of the other comaintainers step up and > say that they take responsibility for supporting TG during Wheezy's > lifetime. I managed to get an ACK from all relevant maintainers, and filed the RM bug: #69