[Python-modules-team] toolz_0.8.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:13:08 -0800 Source: toolz Binary: python3-toolz python-toolz-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.8.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team

[Python-modules-team] Processing of toolz_0.8.2-1_source.changes

toolz_0.8.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: toolz_0.8.2-1.dsc toolz_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz toolz_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___

[Python-modules-team] python-schroot is marked for autoremoval from testing

python-schroot 0.4-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-01-20 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 786566: schroot: Should mark bind mounts in the schroot as private ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#820133: marked as done (Updating the python-decorator Uploaders list)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:21:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#820133: fixed in python-decorator 4.0.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #820133, regarding Updating the python-decorator Uploaders list to be marked as done. This

[Python-modules-team] python-decorator_4.0.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 22:37:09 +0100 Source: python-decorator Binary: python-decorator python3-decorator Architecture: source all Version: 4.0.10-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python Modules

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-decorator_4.0.10-1_amd64.changes

python-decorator_4.0.10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-decorator_4.0.10-1.dsc python-decorator_4.0.10.orig.tar.gz python-decorator_4.0.10-1.debian.tar.xz python-decorator_4.0.10-1_all.deb python-decorator_4.0.10-1_amd64.buildinfo

[Python-modules-team] partd_0.3.6-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:python3-partd is NEW. binary:python3-partd is NEW. source:partd is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

[Python-modules-team] Processed: Bug#820133 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 820133 pending Bug #820133 [python-decorator] Updating the python-decorator Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 820133:

[Python-modules-team] Processing of partd_0.3.6-1_amd64.changes

partd_0.3.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partd_0.3.6-1.dsc partd_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz partd_0.3.6-1.debian.tar.xz partd_0.3.6-1_amd64.buildinfo python3-partd_0.3.6-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

[Python-modules-team] Bug#849023: python3-setproctitle: Enable python3 build tests

Package: python3-setproctitle Version: 1.1.10-1 Build tests are currently run for python2 only. Please enable them for python3 also. I added this to the bottom of the override_dh_auto_test section: $(MAKE) PYTHON=python3 check but some of the tests failed:

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On 21.12.2016 19:16, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> They are still, what the name suggests: candidates, with no confirmation >> to be useful in a production environment. I don't see why they should >> ever migrate to testing (as they did in 1.11.1rc.1). Last time, we had >> an numpy RC in testing for more

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

> They are still, what the name suggests: candidates, with no confirmation > to be useful in a production environment. I don't see why they should > ever migrate to testing (as they did in 1.11.1rc.1). Last time, we had > an numpy RC in testing for more than four months (2016-05-06 to >

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Sandro, On 21.12.2016 16:43, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Sure; what I also don't understand is why numpy pushes its RC and betas >> into unstable instead of experimental (and then maybe check or asks for >> checking for

[Python-modules-team] twisted 16.6.0-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the twisted source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 16.6.0-1 Current version: 16.6.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

[Python-modules-team] python-feather-format REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the python-feather-format source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.1+dfsg1-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #841610: statsmodels: FTBFS: TypeError: cannot

[Python-modules-team] debiancontributors 0.7.6-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the debiancontributors source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.7.5-3 Current version: 0.7.6-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[Python-modules-team] chargebee2-python 2.2.1-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the chargebee2-python source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.2.0-1 Current version: 2.2.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Sure; what I also don't understand is why numpy pushes its RC and betas > into unstable instead of experimental (and then maybe check or asks for > checking for the reverse deps). This makes it harder to revert if there

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On 21.12.2016 16:17, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I can clearly understand why Andreas is unhappy to see when such a > change is uploaded without prior warning 1.5 months after the start > of the freeze, and 1 week before an important deadline for his package. Sure; what I also don't understand is why

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:38:36PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On 21.12.2016 15:29, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> ... > >> The according functions are since then marked as "deprecated" and issue > >> a warning. Numpy

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Adrian, On 21.12.2016 15:29, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >> ... >> The according functions are since then marked as "deprecated" and issue >> a warning. Numpy introduced this change with 1.11rc already, which was >> uploaded to Debian

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >... > The according functions are since then marked as "deprecated" and issue > a warning. Numpy introduced this change with 1.11rc already, which was > uploaded to Debian about 6 months ago. After it appears that many > packages (als

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:54:35AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: >... > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > >> For python-skbio to have any chance of being part of stretch, the > >> latest possible date for an upload of a package without any RC bugs > >> is Christmas

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > In my initial response I mentioned skiping the test. However, I > intended to discuss this first since simply hiding the eyes from an > upgrading problem is not the prefered way to go. youre not closing your eyes to a

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Ole, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 21.12.2016 11:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> For python-skbio it is *really* time to panic *right now*. > > Thanks for confirming that I was not actually

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Sandro, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:54:35AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> For python-skbio it is *really* time to panic *right now*. > >> > >> python-skbio is currently not in testing. > > the last upload (0.5.1-1) was

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi all, On 21.12.2016 11:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> For python-skbio it is *really* time to panic *right now*. > Thanks for confirming that I was not actually panicing. ;-) While I agree in principle, I would like to remind the

[Python-modules-team] Bug#846697: marked as done (python-aiohttp: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b python-aiohttp-1.1.5 gave error exit status 2)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:05:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#845178: fixed in python-aiohttp 1.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #845178, regarding python-aiohttp: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b

[Python-modules-team] Bug#845178: marked as done (FTBFS with super-fresh cython -- seems to carry pre-cythoned sources which get rebuilt during clean)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:05:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#845178: fixed in python-aiohttp 1.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #845178, regarding FTBFS with super-fresh cython -- seems to carry pre-cythoned sources which get

[Python-modules-team] python-aiohttp_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:30:27 +0100 Source: python-aiohttp Binary: python3-aiohttp python3-aiohttp-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python Modules

[Python-modules-team] pydbus_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 13:53:49 +0100 Source: pydbus Binary: python-pydbus python3-pydbus python-pydbus-doc Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team

[Python-modules-team] python-btrees_4.3.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 00:05:31 +0100 Source: python-btrees Binary: python-btrees python3-btrees python-btrees-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4.3.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Adrian and Anton, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > > it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-aiohttp_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes

python-aiohttp_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-aiohttp_1.2.0-1.dsc python-aiohttp_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz python-aiohttp_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz python-aiohttp_1.2.0-1_amd64.buildinfo python3-aiohttp-dbg_1.2.0-1_amd64.deb

[Python-modules-team] Processed: Bug#845178 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 845178 pending Bug #845178 [src:python-aiohttp] FTBFS with super-fresh cython -- seems to carry pre-cythoned sources which get rebuilt during clean Bug #846697 [src:python-aiohttp] python-aiohttp: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error:

[Python-modules-team] python-slugify_1.2.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:44:02 +0200 Source: python-slugify Binary: python-slugify python3-slugify slugify Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python Modules

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-slugify_1.2.1-1_amd64.changes

python-slugify_1.2.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-slugify_1.2.1-1.dsc python-slugify_1.2.1.orig.tar.gz python-slugify_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz python-slugify_1.2.1-1_all.deb python-slugify_1.2.1-1_amd64.buildinfo

[Python-modules-team] webtest_2.0.24-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:45:16 +0100 Source: webtest Binary: python-webtest python3-webtest python-webtest-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.24-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python

[Python-modules-team] Merry Christmas & Happy New Year

  [ View in browser ]( http://r.newsletter.bonescamail.nl/prp2wktaoatrf.html )   [ ]( http://r.newsletter.bonescamail.nl/2v2sbmb8taoatrd.html )   This email was sent to python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org You received this email because you are registered with Bonesca Import en

[Python-modules-team] Processing of webtest_2.0.24-1_amd64.changes

webtest_2.0.24-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: webtest_2.0.24-1.dsc webtest_2.0.24.orig.tar.gz webtest_2.0.24-1.debian.tar.xz python-webtest-doc_2.0.24-1_all.deb python-webtest_2.0.24-1_all.deb python3-webtest_2.0.24-1_all.deb

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Adrian and Anton, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other > > > packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether >

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other > > packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether > > you are either able to suggest patches to get the tests working with the > > new