[Python-modules-team] Bug#863267: Bug#863267: Associated removals

2017-05-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 26, 2017 12:30:17 AM EDT, Neil Williams wrote: >On Fri, 26 May 2017 04:11:49 + >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> I don't see any way to completely resolve this before stretch >> releases other than removing lava-server. > >This is a *django*

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#863267: Associated removals

2017-05-25 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 26 May 2017 04:11:49 + Scott Kitterman wrote: > I don't see any way to completely resolve this before stretch > releases other than removing lava-server. This is a *django* bug! There is no evidence that lava-server is responsible for this - it just has to use

[Python-modules-team] Bug#863267: Associated removals

2017-05-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't see any way to completely resolve this before stretch releases other than removing lava-server. Scott K ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Python-modules-team] Processed: Miscalculates MigrationHistory dependencies between multiple django apps - regression from 1.8

2017-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 863267 Bug #863267 {Done: Scott Kitterman } [src:python-django] python-django: Upgrades from jessie to stretch Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #863267 to the same values previously set >

[Python-modules-team] Processed: Bug was introduced in 1.3.0-1

2017-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 794461 1.3.0-1 Bug #794461 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [python-mock] RequirementParseError: Expected version spec in funcsigs; python_version<"3.3" at ; python_version<"3.3" Marked as found in versions python-mock/1.3.0-1. >

[Python-modules-team] Processed: [bts-link] source package src:python-feather-format

2017-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:python-feather-format > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

[Python-modules-team] [bts-link] source package src:python-feather-format

2017-05-25 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:python-feather-format # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #819997 (http://bugs.debian.org/819997) # Bug title:

[Python-modules-team] python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2017-05-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:python-iso3166 is NEW. binary:python3-iso3166 is NEW. binary:python3-iso3166 is NEW. binary:python-iso3166 is NEW. source:python-iso3166 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319-1_amd64.changes

2017-05-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319-1.dsc python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319.orig.tar.gz python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319-1.debian.tar.xz python-iso3166_0.8.git20170319-1_all.deb

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-django_1.8.18-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-25 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 17:41 +1000, Brian May wrote: > Ian Campbell writes: > > > Yet 1.10.x is going to be in Stretch, according to [0]? If users > > want > > LTS then why aren't we shipping that in our upcoming stable release > > (whether its instead of or in addition to the

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-django_1.8.18-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:41:39PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > Ian Campbell writes: > > > Yet 1.10.x is going to be in Stretch, according to [0]? If users want > > LTS then why aren't we shipping that in our upcoming stable release > > (whether its instead of or in addition to the

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-django_1.8.18-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-25 Thread Brian May
Ian Campbell writes: > Yet 1.10.x is going to be in Stretch, according to [0]? If users want > LTS then why aren't we shipping that in our upcoming stable release > (whether its instead of or in addition to the latest release)? In general the Django LTS releases occur after on