[Python-modules-team] Bug#890200: PyQt5 package should provide an egg-info

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 23:35:14 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Sunday, February 11, 2018 09:19:59 PM VA wrote: > > Package: python-pyqt5 > > Version: 5.9.2+dfsg-1 > > > > Many Debian python packages include an egg-info folder, but python- pyqt5 > > does not. > > The PyQt5

Re: [Python-modules-team] Salsa Vcs-* mass-commits

Will it bypass packages for which such change has already been committed, such as in src:flake8-polyfill (currently under RFS)? Just checking. Cheers, Ghis 2018-02-12 13:41 GMT+00:00 Ondrej Novy : > Hi, > > I would like to mass-commit to all DPMT's projects this: > >

[Python-modules-team] RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1

er version to 11 * Bump the standards version to 4.1.3 * Add missing Enhances relationship Regards, Ghislain Vaillant ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[Python-modules-team] Bug#880402: Blocked by #888458

Control: block -1 by 888458 ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

[Python-modules-team] Bug#883366: python-mechanicalsoup: new upstream version 0.9.0

Dear Paul, On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 12:13:27 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: Source: python-mechanicalsoup Severity: wishlist Please package the new upstream version 0.9.0 of MechanicalSoup: https://github.com/MechanicalSoup/MechanicalSoup/releases I'd be happy to update the packaging

Re: [Python-modules-team] rope version 0.10.5 in unstable

On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 16:29 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > I'd like to move the latest update of spyder from experimental to > unstable, but the latter depends on the Python 3 version of rope which > is only available in experimental. > > Could you please c

[Python-modules-team] Bug#864693: pytest-qt: Fix test dep for the case of multiple supported python3 versions

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:11:29 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > The pytest-qt package's autopkgtests will iterate over all supported python3 > interpreters, but they don't depend on python3-all to guarantee that these > interpreters are installed on the system. Indeed,

[Python-modules-team] Bug#860377: src:dask.distributed: New upstream release

> Please consider packaging the new upstream release of dask.distribtued > (version 0.16.1 at the time of writing). It is required by the latest > version of src:python-xarray, which I am the maintainer of. See the recent autopkgtest reporting for src:python-xarray [1]. Testing on a venv with the

[Python-modules-team] next version of csvkit

On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 16:53 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 15:19 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wr

[Python-modules-team] Bug#854496: python-qtpy: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:34:23 + Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 22:19 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I would consider disabling the test suite (maybe to enable it again > > after the release of Debian 9). > > I believe y

[Python-modules-team] Bug#854496: python-qtpy: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 19:42 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > As far as this bug is concerned, all I can do is tag it for help, since > > I have no clue how to make any sort of progress. If yourself or someone > > else finds a fix for it, I will happily incorporate the corresponding > > patches. >

[Python-modules-team] Bug#854496: Forwarded upstream

control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtpy/issues/100 ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

[Python-modules-team] Bug#854496: python-qtpy: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

control: tags -1 + help On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 18:03 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > However, there is another package involving xvfb-run which always fail > > > for me. Can you reproduce this bug? > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/848063 > > > > > > The maintainer downgraded it to

[Python-modules-team] Bug#854496: What about python-qtawesome? [python-qtpy: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)]

On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 11:35 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 03:27:33PM +0000, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Hi Santiago, thanks for reporting this issue, > > > > > The bug should be reproducible with sbuild on a single CPU virtual > > > machi

[Python-modules-team] Bug#854496: What about python-qtawesome? [python-qtpy: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)]

Hi Santiago, thanks for reporting this issue, > The bug should be reproducible with sbuild on a single CPU virtual machine, > provided you try enough times (as the failure happens randomly). Could you apply the same tests to src:python-qtawesome and report whether you get the same outcome (i.e.

[Python-modules-team] Bug#846871: ITP python-keepalive

Just as an FYI, keepalive was needed for cwltool (#845982) so it is in the process of being packaged (#847319). Thanks Chris for promptly fixing the issues with rdflib and sparqlwrapper. Ghis ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#842661: blocked by missing i-deps in rdflib

control: block -1 by 845643 After refreshing the packaging with version 1.5.0 and adding the rdflib i-dep, the package FTBFS due to missing install dependencies (html5lib and sparqlwrapper). Ghis ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

[Python-modules-team] Bug#846871: Suggested fix

On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:53:59 +0100 Hilko Bengen wrote: > control: tag -1 patch > > Hi, > > I have verified that aff4 builds just fine if the "keepalive=0.5" line > is removed from the requires.txt, so the extra python-keepalive package > is not actually needed. > > Please

[Python-modules-team] Bug#844368: pyparsing: version 2.1.10 makes sphinxcontrib-doxylink FTBFS

Hi Martin, On 28/11/16 13:36, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello all, Ghislain Antony Vaillant [2016-11-14 21:44 +]: Since the update of pyparsing to 2.1.10, the sphinxcontrib-doxylink package now FTBFS and is affected by an RC bug [1]. This or a related regression also affects systemd's hwdb

[Python-modules-team] Bug#841582: Pyparsing error in sphinxcontrib-doxylink

CC-ing this reply to the Debian bug report. Thanks Paul for the patch. I applied it (fixed a missing import for ungroup), used your name for the commit authorship and acknowledged your contribution to the packaging changelog. I will also forward the patch upstream. Many thanks for your

[Python-modules-team] on the maintenance of rope

Dear Arnaud and potential DPMT co-maintainers, I am currently participating in a packaging effort to update spyder [1], a scientific IDE, to its latest upstream version. Amongst its dependencies, spyder requires a fairly recent version of rope for both Python 2 and 3. However, the source

[Python-modules-team] Bug#830606: python-qtawesome: accesses the internet during build

You are correct, here is the following line in conf.py: intersphinx_mapping = {'https://docs.python.org/': None} Thanks for spotting this. Cheers, Ghis ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Python-modules-team] Maintenance of pydap

Ciao Sandro, I recently got involved with the packaging of the HDF compass [1], a viewer for HDF5 written in Python and using pydap as an install dependency. The version of pydap currently packaged is too old to work with the compass, first because version 3.x apparently changed the module API

[Python-modules-team] Bug#764338: pyxb: new upstream release 1.2.4

Quick heads up, The package could not be built from 1.2.4-dev due to some missing components between the github tree and the source tarball. I contacted upstream [1] in order to have a formal release for version 1.2.4, from which both Python 2 and 3 versions of the pyxb module and scripts

[Python-modules-team] Bug#764338: new upstream release v.1.2.4-DEV with python 3 support merged in

Small errata. Python 3 support seems to be merged in a development version (v1.2.4-dev) upstream: https://github.com/pabigot/pyxb With good feedback regarding stability in the mailing list: http://sourceforge.net/p/pyxb/mailman/pyxb-users/?viewmonth=201408 So how about packaging this

[Python-modules-team] Bug#739195: python-virtualenv: permission error with --system-site-packages flag

Package: python-virtualenv Version: 1.11-2 Severity: important Dear package maintainer(s), Any virtualenv created with the --system-site-packages does not work as expected. Any attempt to install a package with pip yields a permission error. Here is an easy example to reproduce this bug: 1)