Hello,
I was just preparing python-foolscap-0.4.0+dfsg-1 and noticed that for
some reason __init__.py files of some submodules are not being included
in the .deb file.
The files in question are foolscap/slicers/__init__.py and
foolscap/logging/__init__.py.
I have been trying to analyze this
#bts control
tag 519594 +upstream
thanks
Sorry it took me a while to respond. This is obviously an upstream
problem, so I will look into getting this reported tonight.
Thanks for your bugreport,
Stephan
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:50 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Package: ipython
Version:
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:27 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]:
Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely
free anyways I thought I could get rid of this problem by simply
removing the w32-specifics when repackaging
Hello debian-python and DPMT,
I have just noticed that a bug against one of the packages I help
maintaining was reported [0] over at Launchpad that is caused by
w32-specific code shipping with my package (python-pyglet).
Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely
free
As ipython 0.9.1-2 is in unstable now I wanted to ask again if anyone
can reproduce this bug using 0.9.1-2.
If this bug cannot be reproduced anymore I would like to close this bug
report.
-- Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
With the recent upload of python-mode 1:5.1.0-1 this problem seems to be
fixed for me.
Could you please confirm this so I can close this bug report?
-- Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Python-modules-team
First of all thanks for your bug report. I am afraid I seem to have
missed this report until now.
I have updated the package in Debian-SVN now. Could you please check
(and confirm) that this fixes the problem for you.
If it does please let me know so I can get the updated package uploaded.
--
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 11:08 -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
However, it appears that Emacs isn't properly interpreting ipython's
colour sequences.
Instead of getting colour, from an Emacs buffer I get
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Nov 14 2008, 21:49:10)
Type copyright, credits
#bts control
notfound 461190 ipython/0.9.1-1
thanks
I wanted to check again if this bug can still be reproduced with ipython
0.9.1-1. Personally I still cannot reproduce it at all. Could you please
give it a try again and report back?
I am also marking the bug as not found in 0.9.1-1 for now,
Hello,
Trying to resolve all ipython bugs right now I wanted to ask whether you
can still reproduce this bug with ipython 0.9.1-1 (in experimental)?
Personally I cannot reproduce it, having emacs22 and ipython installed,
but python-mode not.
If this bug cannot be reproduced by you anymore I
Hello,
as uploading of ipython 0.9.1 to Debian is blocked until foolscap is
accepted (it's in the new queue right now) you might want to give the
packages of foolscap and ipython 0.9.1 I built a try.
If you want to give them a try have a look at http://archive.sp-its.at/
(my personal Debian
Hello,
as I am doing some work cleaning up the bug reports of ipython right now
I wanted to ask if you still experience this problem with a more recent
version of ipython. After giving it a shot I noticed that ipython seems
to be working fine here for both PAGER=less ipython and PAGER='less -R'
# bts control
notfound 455905 0.8.4-1
thanks
Hello,
I just wanted to check whether you still experience this problem in a
more recent version of ipython. I have tried reproducing this problem
with 0.8.4-1, which is in testing right now, and could not find any
problem. Can you confirm this?
If
Hello Jan,
I just wanted to give you a quick heads-up on the status of IPython
0.9.1 in Debian and let you know that this is being worked on.
I am currently working on getting IPython packaged, however, due to a
newly introduced dependency on the foolscap library (which is not
packaged for
# bts control
forwarded 495439 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ipython/+bug/290677
found 495439 0.9.1-1
thanks
I just wanted to let you know that I can confirm this problem and have
forwarded the bug upstream. Also, this problem seems to still be present
in IPython 0.9.1, which is currently being
Hello,
I am just checking whether this bug is still present in IPython. Can you
still reproduce it with a later version?
If not I would like to close this bug report.
Regards,
Stephan
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
# bts control
found 473018 0.9.1-1
thanks
Hello,
I have just had a quick look at the bug you reported and noticed that it
is still present in more recent versions of IPython. I just wanted to
give you a heads-up on this one and let you know that I am going to
report the bug upstream.
Regards,
Hello,
I just wanted to check if this bug is still present in a more recent
version of IPython. Could you please try to reproduce the problem?
I am writing you because I am looking into removing possibly outdated
bug reports which do not apply to more recent versions of IPython
anymore.
owner 494367 !
tag 494367 + confirmed
thanks
I have just committed changes for pyglet-1.1.1 to DPMT SVN, this version
is still marked as UNRELEASED though.
Right now I am working on fixing problems through the inclusion of
non-free files by upstream.
Regards,
Stephan
19 matches
Mail list logo