On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:16:19 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
Hi Scott!
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report was covered by non-free license.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
* Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com, 2013-05-21, 06:20:
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report was covered by non-free license.
Oh come on. Sure, it's silly to release a bug report under a non-free
license. But if we suddenly start caring about bug
On 2013-05-21 09:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com, 2013-05-21, 06:20:
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report was covered by non-free
license.
Oh come on. Sure, it's silly to release a bug report under a
non-free license. But if
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:15:33PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
I am not a laywer, but this is my opinion. Under most definitions of
copyright, a bug report's copyright belongs to its author. We host
them in the BTS at their request, so I don't believe we need any
further license. However if a
On 05/21/2013 03:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
On 2013-05-21 09:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com, 2013-05-21, 06:20:
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report was covered by non-free license.
Oh come on. Sure, it's silly to release a
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/21/2013 03:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
On 2013-05-21 09:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com, 2013-05-21, 06:20:
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report was
On 05/21/2013 10:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
For clarity: the original poster of #709138 asked no such thing; the
poster merely asserted a CC BY-NC license in the .sig of their e-mail.
No, they said, My quotes in this email
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:57:45 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/21/2013 10:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
For clarity: the original poster of #709138 asked no such thing; the
poster merely asserted a CC BY-NC license in
8 matches
Mail list logo
