On Dec 02, 2014, at 10:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Speaking only for myself, I think that sounds reasonable.
It's well established I believe in Debian Python usage that if a user
installs packages in /usr/local and break their system, they are on their
own, so I'm not particularly worried
Package: python-pip
Version: 1.5.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid jessie
pip currently silently removes/updates system provided python packages when used
on the system python. This is only seen when a user calls pip with
administrator rights, but it makes debian python packages somehow
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:37:40 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net
wrote:
On 12/02/2014 11:51 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
I'd very much prefer it if you didn't do this. This *is* going to break
things for people and it's
I'm on my phone so forgive my formatting.
4, 3, 2 I think in order of best to worst in my opinion.
I have another question. If we fix this in the upcoming pip 6 release what is
the chances of getting an exception for pip 6 in the freeze? If I can solve the
problem in pip proper and keep the
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:15:05 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
...
I have another question. If we fix this in the upcoming pip 6 release what
is the chances of getting an exception for pip 6 in the freeze? If I can
solve the problem in pip proper and keep the delta between different
platforms
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:54:37 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:15:05 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
...
I have another question. If we fix this in the upcoming pip 6 release
what
is
On Dec 2, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:54:37 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:15:05 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
...
I have
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 05:17:48 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:54:37 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Tuesday,
On Dec 2, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
Assuming the maintainer doesn't decide to downgrade the bug (which I think is
unlikely and a number of people would object to, so I think we can ignore it
as a possibility), the decision to ignore the bug for Jessie
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 19:28:20 Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
Assuming the maintainer doesn't decide to downgrade the bug (which I think
is unlikely and a number of people would object to, so I think we can
ignore it
10 matches
Mail list logo
