[Python-modules-team] Comments regarding python-pyramid_1.5.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2014-06-30 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Barry, in debian/README.source you wrote that the docs directory has been removed. But it is still available in the source tarball. There might have gone something wrong ... Thorsten ___ Python-modules-team mailing list

Re: [Python-modules-team] Comments regarding python-pyramid_1.5.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2014-06-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 30, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: in debian/README.source you wrote that the docs directory has been removed. But it is still available in the source tarball. There might have gone something wrong ... Hi Thorsten, thanks for the report. I think this may be due to a

Re: [Python-modules-team] Comments regarding python-pyramid_1.5.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2014-06-30 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Barry Warsaw wrote: I suppose it would be best to reject the NEW python-pyramid package, ok, done If you have any suggestions on how to fix the d/watch file so this won't be a problem in the future, please do let me know. Oh, not really ...

Re: [Python-modules-team] Comments regarding python-pyramid_1.5.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2014-06-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 30, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Barry Warsaw wrote: I suppose it would be best to reject the NEW python-pyramid package, ok, done New version uploaded. Hopefully I got it right this time. Cheers, -Barry signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Python-modules-team] Comments regarding python-pyramid_1.5.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2014-06-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 30, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Barry Warsaw wrote: I suppose it would be best to reject the NEW python-pyramid package, ok, done Darn, the new upload was rejected. On Jun 30, 2014, at 09:56 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote: