[Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, python-yaml seems to be a priority: extra package, and I have a package dependent on it which is priority: optional. Before I change the priority, is there any reason python-yaml can't become optional instead? (please keep me in CC, and if you'd rather I file a bug that's no problem.)

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:04:45 + Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: Hi, python-yaml seems to be a priority: extra package, and I have a package dependent on it which is priority: optional. Before I change the priority, is there any reason python-yaml can't become optional

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is extra. If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving pyyaml back to optional. I've been in touch with Anders Kaseorg, libyaml's maintainer, and

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday 23 March 2009 13:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is extra. If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving pyyaml back to optional. I've