The reverted patch was buggy, incomplete and did not solve the problem of
non-reproducible builds due to timestamps in rst2man output.
Debian could solve the problem with a patch setting the config value::
# Disables datestamp; equivalent to --no-datestamp:
datestamp:
in
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Looks like there has been some discussion upstream on this issue:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/132/
Upstream first committed my patch, but then reverted it.
If you can join the
Dear Maintainer,
Looks like there has been some discussion upstream on this issue:
https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/132/
I wonder if it needs poking/moving on...? :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Can you please forward it upstream to [1], or do you want me to do that?
>
> Please go ahead and do that. :)
Done at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/132/.
We are having some interesting discussion there, please
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:39:32PM +0200, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed
> that python-docutils generates non-reproducible output via rst2man.
>
> Patch attached.
Thanks for the patch!
Can you please forward it upstream to [1],
Source: python-docutils
Version: 0.12+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed
that python-docutils
6 matches
Mail list logo
