[Python-modules-team] Bug#831779: python-docutils: please make the output of rst2man reproducible

Hi Chris, On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > Looks like there has been some discussion upstream on this issue: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/132/ Upstream first committed my patch, but then reverted it. If you can join the

[Python-modules-team] flask-compress 1.3.2-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the flask-compress source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.3.2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

[Python-modules-team] mimerender 0.6.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the mimerender source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.6.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[Python-modules-team] sorl-thumbnail 12.3+git20160928-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the sorl-thumbnail source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 12.3+git20160928-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple

[Python-modules-team] Processing of pytest_3.0.3-1_source.changes

pytest_3.0.3-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pytest_3.0.3-1.dsc pytest_3.0.3.orig.tar.gz pytest_3.0.3-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-botocore_1.4.60-1_amd64.changes

python-botocore_1.4.60-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: python-botocore_1.4.60-1.dsc python-botocore_1.4.60.orig.tar.gz python-botocore_1.4.60-1.debian.tar.xz python-botocore_1.4.60-1_all.deb python3-botocore_1.4.60-1_all.deb

[Python-modules-team] Bug#830172: python-docker: fix autopkgtest in current git packaging

On 10 October 2016 at 09:13, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I write here to document our (Jason Pleau and me) intention to adopt > this package. > > So, we'll probably upload an updated package based on Ondrej's work > for 1.9, and then we will go to the work of updating to the

[Python-modules-team] Bug#830172: python-docker: fix autopkgtest in current git packaging

Hi All, On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 19:53:31 +0200 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Tianon Gravi. > > Thanks for your quick followup. > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:37:58AM -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On 8 October 2016 at 10:20, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > > If

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-botocore_1.4.60-1_amd64.changes

python-botocore_1.4.60-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-botocore_1.4.60-1.dsc python-botocore_1.4.60.orig.tar.gz python-botocore_1.4.60-1.debian.tar.xz python-botocore_1.4.60-1_all.deb python3-botocore_1.4.60-1_all.deb Greetings,

[Python-modules-team] Bug#840264: python3-scipy-dbg: can not import ndimage

Package: python3-scipy-dbg Version: 0.18.1-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, during autopkgtest of pyfai, I got an error with python3-dbg To reproduce >>> from scipy import ndimage Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File

[Python-modules-team] Processing of commonmark-bkrs_0.5.4+ds-1_amd64.changes

commonmark-bkrs_0.5.4+ds-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: commonmark-bkrs_0.5.4+ds-1.dsc commonmark-bkrs_0.5.4+ds.orig.tar.xz commonmark-bkrs_0.5.4+ds-1.debian.tar.xz python-commonmark-bkrs-doc_0.5.4+ds-1_all.deb

[Python-modules-team] commonmark-bkrs_0.5.4+ds-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:python-commonmark-bkrs is NEW. binary:python-commonmark-bkrs-doc is NEW. binary:python3-commonmark-bkrs is NEW. source:commonmark-bkrs is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-nine_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes

python-nine_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: python-nine_1.0.0-1.dsc python-nine_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz python-nine_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz python-nine_1.0.0-1_all.deb python3-nine_1.0.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-nine_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes

python-nine_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-nine_1.0.0-1.dsc python-nine_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz python-nine_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz python-nine_1.0.0-1_all.deb python3-nine_1.0.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-rsa_3.4.2-1_amd64.changes

python-rsa_3.4.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: python-rsa_3.4.2-1.dsc python-rsa_3.4.2.orig.tar.gz python-rsa_3.4.2-1.debian.tar.xz python-rsa_3.4.2-1_all.deb python3-rsa_3.4.2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

[Python-modules-team] pytest-mock is marked for autoremoval from testing

pytest-mock 1.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-10-15 It is affected by these RC bugs: 835241: pytest-mock: FTBFS against pytest 3.0.0 ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-rsa_3.4.2-1_amd64.changes

python-rsa_3.4.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-rsa_3.4.2-1.dsc python-rsa_3.4.2.orig.tar.gz python-rsa_3.4.2-1.debian.tar.xz python-rsa_3.4.2-1_all.deb python3-rsa_3.4.2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on

[Python-modules-team] Bug#831779: python-docutils: please make the output of rst2man reproducible

Dear Maintainer, Looks like there has been some discussion upstream on this issue: https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/132/ I wonder if it needs poking/moving on...? :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk