On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:17:29 +0200 Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear HPPA admin,
I'd like to know what is the situation about PyOpenSSL compilation on
hppa port machine. The package version 0.6-5 was uploaded on
2008-03-08 and, as of now, no build attempt was made on hppa[1].
I've
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:04:45 + Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
python-yaml seems to be a priority: extra package, and I have a
package dependent on it which is priority: optional. Before I change the
priority, is there any reason python-yaml can't become optional
On Monday 23 March 2009 13:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is
extra. If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving
pyyaml back to optional.
I've
RS Chakravarti chak...@rediffmail.com wrote:
Dear maintainers,
Sagemath depends on python-processing
which is in Lenny (i386)
but not in Squeeze or Sid.
Also, it depends on python-2.5
but not on 2.6.
Upgrading python removes sagemath.
If possible please fix these problems.
What
I can't reproduce this either. A quick survey of Google results seems to
indicate this can be a sign of a corrupted .pyc file. I'd recommend removing
the .pyc files in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/yaml and then try again.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Rebuilding with the current dh_python3 will fix this, but there's no point in
binNMU since a sourceful upload is needed to fix 591957.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Now that clamav is maintaining API/ABI stability, this should be much more
maintainable through the full release cycle.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
On Monday, November 29, 2010 09:42:55 am Daniel Holbach wrote:
On 29.11.2010 15:17, Sandro Tosi wrote:
* Rebuild with Python2.7.
In Debian we would have scheduled a binNMU and get done with it, so
there's nothing in the package to be done.
In Ubuntu we don't have binNMUs. We need to
Squeeze is frozen and won't be updated before release. I do aim to have
Python 3 support available for PyQt in Unstable soon after it releases.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
I can't actually test this in Debian due to this bug, but it looks like once
it's fixed there's a python2.7 compatibility issue that will need to be
addressed (fortunately with patch):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pyopenssl/+bug/686804
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 09:55:15 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
...
probably numpy was not rebuilt to support python 2.7 yet.
...
It was:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-numpy
Scott K
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
There's a new version of qscintilla2 that I hadn't packaged yet (waiting for
the python-dbus transition to finish) that properly bumps the soname/version to
6.1.0. I'll rebuild the packages that build-depend on libqscintilla2-dev. It
looks like the relevant pacakges are:
monkeystudio ovito
I rebuilt monkeystudio ovito juffed serna-free tora universalindentgui smokeqt
(skipping salome as previously mentioned) with the newest qscintilla2 from
upstream.
serna-free FTBFS for other reasons and is RC buggy (55) so I won't
consider it further.
ovito juffed tora universalindentgui
kscope FTBFS due to 631779, but gets to that stage with the new qscintilla2,
so is probably fine.
smokekde builds fine.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Would you please check and see if 4.12.4 I just uploaded to Unstable works any
better for you.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Probably just qwt.
IIRC last time I updated python-qt4, qwt didn't like it either. I
believe qwt does a runtime check and aborts as you describe if the
version doesn't match what it was compiled again.
I don't think this is actually a python-qt4 bug, but a feature of qwt.
I will be
It's being addressed. See #647210.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On 11/08/2011 04:48 PM, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647695
It seems to me that there is an incompatibility between
python-qt4 (4.8.3-4, 4.8.6-2) and libqtwebkit 2.1.0~2011week09-3
And that the right dependency of python-qt4 should be at
I can confirm the bug, but it's a byproduct of the new sip4. Downgrading to
the sip4 in Testing produces a successful build.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Upstream says this Sip4 version only works with PyQt4 4.9, so I'll leave this
RC bug open against Sip4 to keep the new version out of Testing until we can
get PyQt4 (python-qt4) updated.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I believe I see what my mistake was.
Thanks,
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Already fixed. Your PPA is out of date. If you have problems with an Ubuntu
PPA, please deal with the PPA owner and not the Debian BTS.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 08:22:35 PM Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that there are quite a few python modules (pyglew, daap,
pyxine, pycg, dhm, etc.) that are currently under maintenance by this
team on the orphaned package list:
http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html
I was going
Did you get the patch directly from upstream or is it in their latest
snapshot?
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
The relevant packages have been rebuilt several times since this bug was filed
and I can't reproduce the error in either python2.6, 2.7, or 3.2. I believe
it's resolved.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
On Saturday, February 18, 2012 09:39:55 AM Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
Please, when renaming packages don't forget to add conflict with older
name. I am not the first time stumbling upon 'trying to overwrite ...
which is also in package' error with python packages. That were on
upgrades from 2.5
I think that such a method would be fragile. I don't think a solution that
requires maintainers to manually review code from new upstream releases to
adjust dependencies is adequate. To do such a thing we'd need a tools to
search the code and generate proper dependencies. I didn't think much
:03.0 -0500
+++ storm-0.19/debian/changelog 2012-03-20 09:54:11.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+storm (0.19-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fixed watch file to work with Launchpad again
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:53:49 -0400
+
storm (0.19-1) unstable; urgency=low
Sent to the PyQt development list.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
This should be fixed as of tonight's upstream snapshot and will be in the next
python-qt4 release.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Please provide the exact steps you used to run this demo so I can try to
reproduce the problem.
Thanks,
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 01:41:41 PM Yann Dirson wrote:
...
Looking at /usr/share/doc/python-qt4-doc/examples/README, no exact
command to run the examples is given, but the hint about
examples/demos/qtdemo led me to launch:
/usr/share/doc/python-qt4-doc/examples/demos/qtdemo/qtdemo.py
The examples are meant to be run from examples/demos/qtdemo/qtdemo.py. It's
not been ported to python3 yet, so there's not a good way to do this as
provided from upstream.
If I run graphicsview/anchorlayout.py with python2.7 I also get a segmentation
fault, so there is something worth looking
Since the problem is triggered by the Qt version changing, it's not clear to
me how to catch this automatically. I'll see what I can do about this case.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Queued binnmus for qscintilla2 which should deal with this.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
I believe this will be fixed by the qscintilla2 binNMU I had done today.
Please check if you still have this problem after updating it.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Saturday, May 05, 2012 11:07:29 AM PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
...
so a binNMU of pyqwt5 should be enought
...
Scheduled. Please let me know in the bug if that solves it for you.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Can you rebuild calibre and see if that fixes it?
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Please test again 4.13.2-1+b1 after it is built.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
PyKDE is reported to be working now, so please retry and see if the problem
still appears.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
For Python, we have python-qt4-gl. It depends on python-opengl. Python-
opengl is not ported to Python 3 yet, so there's no way to support
PyQt4/QtOpenGL yet.
We'll support it when the dependencies are available (python3-opengl) and it's
part of what upstream ships. I imagine it'll be
The dependency relationship predates my work on the package, so I've assumed
it's correct. Perhaps it was a some point and it's not now. Next time I
update the package, I can see if I can build this module for Python 3.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Just for the record, reported upstream with patch. See
http://pyyaml.org/ticket/247
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
The Avogadro dependency is incorrect and should be fixed. Depends: python2.7,
python-qt4 will do what you want. Since, if Avogadro needs 2.7, you need to
depend on it directly, also depending on python2.7-qt4 is redundant.
Scott K
P.S. Due to a multi-day power outage all I've got to work from
That's a bug in the policy I failed to notice. It should be restricted to
packages that build modules only for the non-default version of Python which
Avogadro doesn't. One or the other package needs to be changed. I agree with
that.
python-avogadro is the only package in the archive that
On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 10:19:34 PM Daniel Leidert wrote:
...
If the policy is not correct, it should be fixed after Wheezy release.
I'd appreciate a pointer from your site, when you start the discussion.
...
After the Wheezy release having the provides will be entirely superfluous since
I can. Thanks for the second opinion.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
sip4 will cause you the same problem. I'll take care of that too.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 07:59:19 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
sip4 will cause you the same problem. I'll take care of that too.
Actually that's wrong. Sip4 is fine.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
I have a patch from upstream that I'm testing.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Uploading directly since this is over a week with no response from the
maintainer. NMU diff is identical to the last patch attached except for
unstable/UNRELEASED.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
That was meant to go to a different bug.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 06:00:19 PM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
my guess is that it needs overrides for dh_python* calls like I did
recently for cython:
override_dh_python2:
dh_python2 -pcython
override_dh_python3:
dh_python3 -pcython3
Yes. Something like that should work.
From upstream:
Almost certainly a user error/Qt feature. Try creating a QApplication
instance first.
Please try this and report back if you are still having a problem.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com
python-qt4 (U)
qscintilla2 (U)
Sune Vuorela s...@debian.org
pykde4 (U)
Torsten Marek shlo...@debian.org
python-qt4 (U)
qscintilla2 (U)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Waiting on the release team to approve a sip4 transition (#707239).
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:16:19 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
Hi Scott!
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report was covered by non-free license.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/21/2013 03:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
On 2013-05-21 09:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com, 2013-05-21, 06:20:
What do you mean by non-free content?
The reporter specified the bug report
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:57:45 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/21/2013 10:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
For clarity: the original poster of #709138 asked no such thing; the
poster merely asserted a CC BY-NC license
hppa is no longer an official Debian architecture, si this is not an RC bug.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Should have this fixed today.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Fixed sip is uploaded. This will take some other package updates/rebuilds
before it's resolved, however. No need to file more bugs.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 05:04:50 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
Fixed sip is uploaded. This will take some other package updates/rebuilds
before it's resolved, however. No need to file more bugs.
Rebuilds are done for the more popular architectures. For some of the slower
ones it'll be a bit
Maintainer request - package is misbuilt due to a dh_python3 bug.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Python-modules-team
On Sunday, August 04, 2013 17:31:30 you wrote:
Package: python-qt4
Version: 4.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
FTBFS on ports isn't a serious bug. The problem is that python and python3
are behind on hppa, not a bug in
On Monday, August 05, 2013 19:14:33 John David Anglin wrote:
On 4-Aug-13, at 8:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
FTBFS on ports isn't a serious bug. The problem is that python and
python3
are behind on hppa, not a bug in this package.
Updating python and python3 fixes build. Perhaps
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 14:35:18 you wrote:
The kFreeBSD python3-numpy packages somehow lack .so files, making
them unusable and causing matplotlib to FTBFS:
Also pandas, pyfits, and python-scipy.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Sorry about that - I sent the done to the wrong bug.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 15:13:39 Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org writes:
The kFreeBSD python3-numpy packages somehow lack .so files, making
them unusable and causing matplotlib to FTBFS:
As this came up on #-mentors just now:
I suspect the problem is the
On Saturday, August 31, 2013 16:25:16 Jerome Kieffer wrote:
Dear Debian Python Modules Team,
Could you please have python-qt4 recompiled for Debian6-Squeeze including
this patch to fix bug #697348.
Are you sure that's right? That code in the Wheezy version of python-qt4 is:
if
On Saturday, August 31, 2013 21:36:29 Jerome Kieffer wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:47:18 -0400
Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Saturday, August 31, 2013 16:25:16 Jerome Kieffer wrote:
Dear Debian Python Modules Team,
Could you please have python-qt4 recompiled
In the maintainer's opinion due to breaking other applications.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
The fix has been approved by the release team, so I've uploaded it. It will be
available once they've accept it.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Julien Danjou a...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Could you please maintain this package using Git? It'd be nice, since
that's an OpenStack stuff, and that everything there is maintained
using
Git. If there is still resistance in the Python Module team, then you
If this is still a problem, it's pykde4 needing to be rebuilt with the new
sip.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On January 31, 2014 6:42:51 AM EST, Thorsten Alteholz
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
there are two lintian errors in your new examples-package:
lintian check for pyqt5-examples_5.2+dfsg-2_all.deb
E: pyqt5-examples: changelog-file-not-compressed changelog
E:
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 16:43:22 Barry Warsaw wrote:
Switching to --user by default is being actively discussed upstream:
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1668
In the meantime, I plan on updating the manpage to describe --user and any
other missing options.
Can you go ahead and make
Source: pyzmq
Version: 14.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The current pymzq upload FTBFS on the mentioned architectures. The mips*
failures are different than the kfreebsd* failures. This package is part
of the transition to
Source: python-tornado
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
While rebuilding your package on mips as part of the python3.3 removal
transition, the following test failure (and FTBFS) ocurred:
# python3 tests only in
On Friday, June 13, 2014 21:47:55 Torsten Paul wrote:
Package: libqt5scintilla2-dev
Version: 2.8.1-4
Severity: important
The features file is installed in
/usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/features/qscintilla2.prf but qmake seems to only
read from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features. This
Yes. It's fine to keep them all in one bug. Translations aren't architecture
specific so I'd guess the current location for the Qt5 translation is fine
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 19:02:32 Torsten Paul wrote:
Hi!
It looks like that affects also the header files. Using the installed
Qt/qmake, they are searched in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 but the
dev package installs the Qsci headers in /usr/include/qt5.
Using
Excellent. Thanks for both the detailed report and testing.
Scott K
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Friday, June 20, 2014 16:55:29 Julian Taylor wrote:
in svn I have disabled all performance relevant tests which includes
this one. Upstream has a convinient switch for that for the CI. its
currently waiting for sponsoring.
Looking at it.
Scott K
On Thursday, July 03, 2014 08:37:14 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
reassign 753581 libqscintilla2-designer
thanks
On Thursday 03 July 2014 09:30:44 Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Package: qt4-designer
Version: 4:4.8.6+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
On Friday, July 04, 2014 07:44:24 Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi Lisandro and Scott
Thanks for the answers
_ZN13QsciScintillaC1EP7QWidget demangles to
QsciScintilla::QsciScintilla(QWidget*) and
qscintilla2-2.8.2+dfsg/Qt4Qt5/qsciscintilla.cpp has
QsciScintilla::QsciScintilla(QWidget
On Sunday, July 13, 2014 03:08:55 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Control: severity -1 serious
Yaroslav Halchenko y...@debian.org (2014-07-07):
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 4 mai 2014 09:15 +0200, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org :
There is another problem on sparc that makes
On Thursday, July 17, 2014 21:15:07 jb wrote:
This affects me too. Regrettably some of us still need to use and develop
systems based on legacy python versions, having virtualenv working with old
python versions is important.
But unrelated to if virtualenv is using python or python3 as it's
On July 21, 2014 6:40:21 AM EDT, Jürgen E. Fischer j...@norbit.de wrote:
Package: python-qscintilla2
Version: 2.8.3+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
python-qscintilla2 doesn't currently include the sip files. In turn
it's not
possible to provide sip bindings to classes derived from
Source: pyqt5
Version: 5.3.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: maintainer designated
Python 3.4.1 (default, Jul 6 2014, 22:30:31)
[GCC 4.9.0] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import PyQt5
import PyQt5.QtCore
Python 3.4.1 (default, Jul 6 2014,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Both of the human maintainers/uploaders of gnupginterface are retired. See
#698274 and #729385, leaving only the Debian Python Modules Team as an
uploader. The package has gone almost 5 years without an upload and over a
decade with no upstream release.
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 15:10:56 Brian May wrote:
On 12 August 2014 14:33, Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
wrote:
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
Maintainer request - changelong UNRELEASED.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:02:26 +0200 Michael Vogt m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Package: python-geoip
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
Hi,
attached is a patch from Ubuntu to build a debug package
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:24:06 +0200
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= g...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Thomas packaged v0.15.2 and uploaded to experimental. In my opinion it
should be uploaded to Sid and let migrate to Jessie.
...
Now that we are in Freeze, this is pretty
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:47:54 -0500 Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Please donât change the default. There is no way in pip to turn that flag
*off*
again once it's turned on and any flag added by Debian will be Debian specific
and confuse people. We (pip) plan to make this change on our
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:37:40 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net
wrote:
On 12/02/2014 11:51 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
I'd very much prefer it if you didn't do this. This *is* going to break
things for people and it's
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:15:05 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
...
I have another question. If we fix this in the upcoming pip 6 release what
is the chances of getting an exception for pip 6 in the freeze? If I can
solve the problem in pip proper and keep the delta between different
platforms
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:54:37 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:15:05 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
...
I have another question. If we fix this in the upcoming pip 6 release
what
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 05:17:48 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 02, 2014 04:54:37 PM Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com
wrote:
On Tuesday
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
