Johnny deBris wrote:
it is usually not bad to change your code to improve
testability.
I suppose that should be the rule of thumb.
T
--
C.T. Matsumoto
Claes de Vrieselaan 60a III
3021 JR Rotterdam
The Netherlands
tel.: +31 (0)6 41 45 08 54
___
Pyth
C.T. Matsumoto wrote:
At least for this example, it seems funny that some of the convenience
functions on a type, when strung together can do some pretty weird
things that need checking, but nevertheless are nicely placed in the
function your are using them in. A better example is re.
Yes, th
Cheers Guido,
Yeah I'm with you that you should not be testing *how* the function is
going about doing things... but lets say your making a function to
format string output. On the one hand your function contains everything
nicely enough, without bifurcating the code into lots of small pieces.
Konrad Delong wrote:
On 23 April 2010 11:56, C.T. Matsumoto wrote:
Hello all,
Does anyone know a good way to test function objects? It's easy enough to
test class attributes, but for some reason I'm finding it difficult to test
if a function has the right 'attributes'.
I'm using unittest and
C.T. Matsumoto wrote:
Does anyone know a good way to test function objects? It's easy enough
to test class attributes, but for some reason I'm finding it difficult
to test if a function has the right 'attributes'.
Do you mean local variables? In that case, I would suggest not to test
those -
Maybe you should raise an exception when x or y have the wrong value,
because you don't want the wrong local variables in your function anyway, I
assume.
Then (unit)test if this actually happens with the "wrong" parameters in your
function.
Gr,
Zaheer
2010/4/23 Konrad Delong
> On 23 April 2010
On 23 April 2010 11:56, C.T. Matsumoto wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone know a good way to test function objects? It's easy enough to
> test class attributes, but for some reason I'm finding it difficult to test
> if a function has the right 'attributes'.
>
> I'm using unittest and nosetests.
>
Hello all,
Does anyone know a good way to test function objects? It's easy enough
to test class attributes, but for some reason I'm finding it difficult
to test if a function has the right 'attributes'.
I'm using unittest and nosetests.
Sample function:
def foo():
x = 3
y = 4
This
