On 08/31/2014 04:19 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote:
(I'm making a bit of a point about it as I don't want to default to
Amsterdam as the default meeting location for the 10-year-old PUN
meetings just because someone decided to start a python group in
Amsterdam a few months ago :-) )
I don't think
On 01-09-14 09:31, Folkje wrote:
In this case, I tried very hard to hook up with the organizers of PUN,
because I too heard that there were plans to organize one in sept/okt in
Amsterdam. Since I failed at getting anything confirmed, I just decided
to go on with our own plans. If you still want,
On 01-09-14 08:35, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
That said, I tend to see the general PUN meetings as pretty much
pure/mostly Python and scheduled to be*anywhere*, and the Byte
meetups as being fairly Python but also broader (talks on Ansible,
regexen, CMSes, that sort of thing) and based in Amst
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:35:42PM +0200, Reinout van Rees wrote:
> On 01-09-14 08:35, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
> >That said, I tend to see the general PUN meetings as pretty much
> >pure/mostly Python and scheduled to be*anywhere*, and the Byte
> >meetups as being fairly Python but also broad
On 1 September 2014 17:11, Mallory van Achterberg
wrote:
...
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:35:42PM +0200, Reinout van Rees wrote:
>
> ...
> > There aren't many talks that are pure about something very
> > python-internal. There was one at the last PUN, though, a nice one
> > about "async, coroutin
On 01-09-14 16:11, Mallory van Achterberg wrote:
>There aren't many talks that are pure about something very
>python-internal. There was one at the last PUN, though, a nice one
>about "async, coroutines, event loops", which looks a bit like the
>"Python, Parallelism and Concurrency" that you've p