Hi,
Why does the following code generate an E0611 warning? It seems
perfectly alright to me:
$ pylint mymodule/bar.py
* Module mymodule.bar
C0111: 1: Missing docstring
C0102: 1: Black listed name "bar"
E0611: 4: No name 'foo' in module ''
W0611: 4: Unused import bla
$ pylint --v
Hi,
This works fine:
$ pylint --disable=C0111 --disable=C0102 mymodule/bar.py
* Module mymodule.bar
E0611: 4: No name 'foo' in module ''
W0611: 4: Unused import bla
But this does not:
$ pylint --rcfile rc mymodule/bar.py
* Module mymodule.bar
C0111: 1: Missing docstr
Hi Dan,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:07:07PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> What do the owners of the code think about attempting to come up with a
> version that runs on (though not _necessarily_ against) 2.6, 2.7 and 3.x
> unmodified? This would almost certainly mean this new version would not run
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:13:43PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > I've checked out the sources with:
> > hg clone http://www.logilab.org/hg/pylint
> > hg clone http://www.logilab.org/src/logilab/astng
> > hg clone http://www.logilab.org/src/logilab/common
> >
>
> BTW, do all three of these have a
Hi again,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:31:48PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Another question: logilab-common seems to be larger than pylint itself.
> Does pylint use all of logilab-common? logilab-common seems to hold a
> bunch of miscellaneous code.
pylint$ rgrep -h 'from logilab.common' * | g
Hi.
Shouldn't there be some class foo in foo.py ?
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:54:58 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why does the following code generate an E0611 warning? It seems
> perfectly alright to me:
>
> $ pylint mymodule/bar.py
> * Module mymodule.bar
> C0111: 1: Missin
Hi Eric,
No, there is no need for a foo class. I am trying to import the module
foo from the package mymodule.
Best,
Niko
On 08/15/2010 02:14 PM, Eric Deplagne wrote:
> Shouldn't there be some class foo in foo.py ?
>
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:54:58 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why
