On 2016-01-18 2:50 PM, Charles-François Natali wrote:
No caveats, actually I think this should be the default (that's the
asyncio will set it by default in 3.6.
Yury
What performance do you get after setting TCP_NODELAY?
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 3:11:33 PM UTC+3, Yuriy Homyakov wrote:
>
> Its works! Thank you very much!
>
> i have added
> transport._sock.setsockopt(socket.IPPROTO_TCP, socket.TCP_NODELAY, True)
>
> is there any caveats? possible problems?
No caveats, actually I think this should be the default (that's the
case for example for all TCP sockets in Go, zmq also sets it, and all
web browers).
2016-01-18 12:11 GMT+00:00 Yuriy Homyakov :
> Its works! Thank you very much!
>
> i have added
> transport._sock.setsockopt(socket.IPPROTO_TCP,
Its works! Thank you very much!
i have added
transport._sock.setsockopt(socket.IPPROTO_TCP, socket.TCP_NODELAY, True)
is there any caveats? possible problems?
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 12:06:19 PM UTC+3, Charles-François Natali
wrote:
>
> It's just a random guess, but does asyncio set TCP
It's just a random guess, but does asyncio set TCP_NODELAY on the sockets?
2016-01-18 7:33 GMT+00:00 Yuriy Homyakov :
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to implement RPC through RabbitMQ, described here
> http://www.rabbitmq.com/tutorials/tutorial-six-python.html
>
> With pika and twisted i getting 1000 RPC c
Hi!
I am trying to implement RPC through RabbitMQ, described
here http://www.rabbitmq.com/tutorials/tutorial-six-python.html
With pika and twisted i getting 1000 RPC calls per second, similar
implementation on asyncio yields only 25 RPC calls per second.
Asyncio adapter for pika i implement my