On 28/02/2011 9:56 AM, Michel Claveau wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for 216.
But, I have the same problem, when I want acces to Python/Pywin32-COM's
servers. (However, no message on msvcr90)
Below, example of messages.
If I reinstall 214, the problem is solved.
I meant to mention in my announcement that
Hmmm... projects get abandoned for many reasons.
Michael:
In your professional opinion would it be worthwhile to
clone/fork/resurrect the pythonnet project, or is it a bad idea better left
dead?
--
Vernon
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
>
> On 26 February 2011 20:31, G
Hi!
Thanks for 216.
But, I have the same problem, when I want acces to Python/Pywin32-COM's
servers. (However, no message on msvcr90)
Below, example of messages.
If I reinstall 214, the problem is solved.
@-salutations
--
Michel Claveau
---
Microsoft Visual C++ R
On 26 February 2011 20:31, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Until recently I didn't think it was possible to use .NET
> libraries from CPython, but then I came across this:
>
> http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net/
>
> Using this, it looks like it should be possible to create
> a PyGUI implementation based on Win
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
> Hi all,
> Hot on the heels of being happy to announce build 215, I'm fairly
> nonchalant about announcing the release of pywin32 build 216 .
>
> This release is primarily to address some build related issues in build 215.
> If you use pywin3
Hi all,
Hot on the heels of being happy to announce build 215, I'm fairly
nonchalant about announcing the release of pywin32 build 216 .
This release is primarily to address some build related issues in build
215. If you use pywin32 to host COM objects (as opposed to simply using
COM objec
From: "Greg Ewing"
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:orasn...@gmail.com]
> If it will still be possible to use the standard Win32 GUI,
> it is OK to be able to use Windows Forms as an adition.
No, if I go this way, I would probably stop maintaining
the current implementation. I don't want to have t
