On 13/10/2011 12:16 AM, Michael Illgner wrote:
2011/10/12 Graham Bloice:
Thanks Graham - I fixed the typo.
I think this feature is great, the use case I run across most often is the
last one mentioned, where the IDL specifies a VARIANT parameter but the COM
object is actually much more pick
2011/10/12 Graham Bloice :
> I think this feature is great, the use case I run across most often is the
> last one mentioned, where the IDL specifies a VARIANT parameter but the COM
> object is actually much more picky about the accepted types.
That sounds great, but I just switched to comtypes :-
On 12/10/2011 02:24, Mark Hammond wrote:
> I just pushed a change which introduces a new win32com.client.VARIANT
> object. This object can be used in some situations to control the specific
> types passed as parameters to COM objects and should address a relatively
> common problem people hit when
