On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:14:32 -0700, "Hughes, Chad O"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, the bottleneck is not the CPU. Using Perfmon, I have verified
>that I can currently have 1000 threads running with under 25% CPU usage.
>The threads are fairly light weight. However, the stack size for eac
x and I am running my app Windows and I
was looking for a solution that does not require a Python recompile.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Roberts
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:32 AM
To: python-win32@python.org
Subject: [python-
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:25:50 -0700, "Hughes, Chad O"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a program that needs to create a great deal of threads.
>Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find a way to lower the 1MB default
>stack size per thread. The threading module does not seem to support
>setting the
> I have a program that needs to create a great deal of
> threads. Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find a way to lower
> the 1MB default stack size per thread. The threading module
> does not seem to support setting the stack size explicitly.
> I have 1GB of memory on my system so I can only
hon-win32@python.org
Subject: [python-win32] 1MB Thread Stack Size
I have a program that needs to create a great deal of threads.
Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find a way to lower the 1MB default stack
size per thread. The threading module does not seem to support setting the
stack size explic
Title: 1MB Thread Stack Size
I have a program that needs to create a great deal of threads. Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find a way to lower the 1MB default stack size per thread. The threading module does not seem to support setting the stack size explicitly. I have 1GB of memory on my
