> I got the impression from table 12-1 of "Python
> Programming on Win32" that writing 3 *(10 **9) to
> Excel would succeed, but it seems to overflow, while
> writing 3.0 *(10 **9) succeeds. Is this standard
> behavior, or perhaps a bug?
Yes, it is a bug. I have fixed it here. As you noticed, a
I got the impression from table 12-1 of "Python
Programming on Win32" that writing 3 *(10 **9) to
Excel would succeed, but it seems to overflow, while
writing 3.0 *(10 **9) succeeds. Is this standard
behavior, or perhaps a bug?
Environment:
Windows 2000
Python 2.4.2
pywin32-207
Thanks for the he
