Tim Roberts wrote:
Are you running this on a different computer?
No, it's the same computer. I can run 2.x and 3.x versions
of the same test side by side, and the 2.x one has normal
sized text whereas the 3.x one has tiny text.
Oddly, it only seems to affect text drawn by the standard
win32 c
Greg Ewing wrote:
> I recently tried running PyGUI on Python 3 using
> pywin32 build 216, and a couple of things are
> not working quite the same way as they were with
> Python 2 and build 213.
>
> 1) The default font used for control labels etc.
> is slightly smaller.
>
> 2) When I calculate the w
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
[...]
>
> the 32 bit version of pywin32 appears to have 2.x syntax .py files).
[...]
No, not completely 2.x syntax, only "except SomeError, e" so if you
get lucky, some modules might import okay.
The version of setup.py that I use in the stan
On 4/03/2011 3:26 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Mark Hammond wrote:
What version of python and how many bits? I'm guessing you tried 3.2,
which means you must have used the 64bit version
No, it's 3.1, and 32 bit. It can't be 64, because the
machine I'm running it on can't handle that. (And it's
defin
Mark Hammond wrote:
What version of python and how many bits? I'm guessing you tried 3.2,
which means you must have used the 64bit version
No, it's 3.1, and 32 bit. It can't be 64, because the
machine I'm running it on can't handle that. (And it's
definitely not 23 bit either. :-)
The only o
On 4/03/2011 1:31 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
I recently tried running PyGUI on Python 3 using
pywin32 build 216, and a couple of things are
not working quite the same way as they were with
Python 2 and build 213.
1) The default font used for control labels etc.
is slightly smaller.
2) When I calcula
