I'm sorry that I have been misunderstood. As the conversation goes on (the for
loop in the code) the list of keys in the query sent to the remote computers
grows in length. I would expect that each query will contain only one key (the
key I query about), but it seems to aggregate all the previou
On 04/02/2010 12:10, Eli Sandler wrote:
Here a sample of the captured stream, from somewhere at the relative beginning.
%..
..'`...=.W5.#M..Y.User
...
...S.t.d.R.e.g.P.r.o.v.UserG.e.t.S.t.r.i.n.g.V.a.l.u.e.{...{...MEOW.
> However I can't see any particular reason why each new query should
> contain
> all the previous ones. Can you show an example of your network trace?
>
> TJG
Here a sample of the captured stream, from somewhere at the relative beginning.
%..
..'`...=.W5.#M..Y.
On 04/02/2010 10:48, Eli Sandler wrote:
I have a curious problem. I use Tim Golden’s module for WMI, and I use the
‘StdRegProv’ to query a remote registry over WMI. I get an unusual network load
for this procedure.
Using a packet capture, I saw that each new query contains all the previous
on
