> this mailing list is for discussion of Mark Hammond's
> python-win32 aka win32all package. news:com.lang.python
> is more appropriate and would give you a wider audience.
I occasionally see this kind of reminder here, but it's
not obvious from the name of mailing list, nor it's
description on
[Jeff Bauer]
> > this mailing list is for discussion of Mark Hammond's
> > python-win32 aka win32all package. news:com.lang.python
> > is more appropriate and would give you a wider audience.
>I occasionally see this kind of reminder here, but it's
>not obvious from the name of mailing list
For
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tim Golden
Sent: 05 December 2005 15:28
To: python-win32@python.org
Subject: Re: [python-win32] win32 meta-topic
[Jeff Bauer]
> > this mailing list is for discussion of Mark Hammond's
> > python-win32 aka
I'm trying to setup an application that runs as a Windows service to rotate logs upon receiving a certain signal. Whenever I try to do this I get the following error.
Exception in TestService.SvcStart: signal only works in main thread
Attached is a very trimmed down example. To run the example a
[Justin Johnson]
> I'm trying to setup an application that runs as a
> Windows service to rotate logs upon receiving a certain
> signal. Whenever I try to do this I get the following error.
> Exception in TestService.SvcStart: signal only works in main
thread
Is there some reason you hav
I was trying to keep things consistent with UNIX, but I suppose there's no reason I have to do things that way. Thanks.
On 12/5/05, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Justin Johnson]> I'm trying to setup an application that runs as a> Windows service to rotate logs upon receiving a certain
>
Tim Golden wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tim Golden
> Sent: 05 December 2005 15:28
> To: python-win32@python.org
> Subject: Re: [python-win32] win32 meta-topic
>
> [Jeff Bauer]
>
>
>>>this mailing list is for discu
John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have any suggestions on what advice to give (a) people who
> post from work via e-mail, engendering enormous disclaimers (b) possibly
> over-sensitive folk who are annoyed by (a)?
Give those (b) people advice to ignore it (be tolerant when r
