<>
Thanks for the update.
Makes me happy that it's being looked at. I'll wait and see.
Regards
John Aherne
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
Here is some relevant information that I exchanged with Robin on 23 March
about the source diffs provided by Brian Retford:
>Jeffrey Barish wrote:
>> Were you able to get this posted on starship? Will you post directions
>> on how
>> to access it at starship?
>
>I haven't done it yet, I'd like
It is sometime since I last checked but I have not seen any reference to
any more developments for the wxpython port to pocket pc.
There was a mention sometime back that the sources would be handed to
Robin Dunn. But since then I have found it almost impossible to trace a
copy of the original p
I am most definately interested. I tried to get this to run some time
ago, and my PocketPC just didnt seem to have the memory to cope with
it - so I would love to try it again. And yes - I do agree Windows CE
has a retarded memory architecture. While I appretiate the raw
processing power I have in
Brian Retford wrote:
It's that time again - I've made a lot of progress on reducing the
footprint of my wxPython CE port, I'm working on getting the source
code integrated to the mainline, here's an x-post from the wxPython
dev list - any interest?
It sounds very interesting. Is it only comp
It's that time again - I've made a lot of progress on reducing the
footprint of my wxPython CE port, I'm working on getting the source
code integrated to the mainline, here's an x-post from the wxPython dev
list - any interest?
Some people may remember this from many months ago, but I've por
