Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-11 Thread John Gill
t for users and developers of Python for .NET Subject: Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet Agreed - had no problem building in VS. I did have some problems in setup.py, that I pointed out (but only having to do with my registry keys not aligning with what the script

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-05 Thread Adam Klein
is mind blowing. Kudos once again. From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+aklein=bmcm@python.org] On Behalf Of David Anthoff Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 3:38 PM To: 'A list for users and developers of Python for .NET' Subject: Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pi

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Tony Roberts
riedman > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 4, 2014 9:49 AM > *To:* A list for users and developers of Python for .NET > *Subject:* Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre > pythonnet > > Umm. As an asside: seriously? You are only supporting setup.py builds > f

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread David Anthoff
Bradley Friedman Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 11:36 AM To: pythondotnet@python.org Subject: Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet Yes. But the problem is: before the migration, those things DID work. And it was the pip/setup.py that needed to be fixed up

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Bradley Friedman
ix all of these things. > > From: PythonDotNet > [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+anthoff=berkeley@python.org] On Behalf Of > Brad Friedman > Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 9:49 AM > To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET > Subject: Re: [Python.NET] homebrew

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread David Anthoff
Friedman Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 9:49 AM To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET Subject: Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet Umm. As an asside: seriously? You are only supporting setup.py builds from this branch? That's a pr

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Brad Friedman
Umm. As an asside: seriously? You are only supporting setup.py builds from this branch? That's a problem. Python.net is also used to embed python. Therefore, it should build from IDE on all platforms and also from an autotools system. > On Jun 4, 2014, at 6:15 AM, Tony Roberts wrote: > >

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Adam Klein
n…) From: Adam Klein Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:55 AM To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET Subject: RE: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet Sorry for not being clear – 1) I’m not building on homebrew on mac :) I am building myself using

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Adam Klein
Right, so the assembly is indeed found in the pythonpath, but other assemblies it depends on transitively (in the same directory) are not loaded as a result of the malformation of the path + name string ... On Jun 3, 2014, at 7:48 PM, "Tribble, Brett" mailto:btrib...@ea.com>> wrote: It has bee

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Adam Klein
irm others see this behavior as well. From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+aklein=bmcm@python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Roberts Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 6:15 AM To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET Subject: Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Adam Klein
: pythondotnet@python.org Subject: RE: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet I think I found one problem ... in FindAssembly (in assemblymanager.cs), the name it passes for assembly dependencies seems to be of the following form: "c:\\path\\Assembly, Version=2.0.0.0, Cu

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Adam Klein
I think I found one problem ... in FindAssembly (in assemblymanager.cs), the name it passes for assembly dependencies seems to be of the following form: "c:\\path\\Assembly, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null" It therefore fails to find the assembly... From: PythonDotNet [m

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-04 Thread Tony Roberts
Hi Adam, that 2.0.0.beta1 build was built from the source on github here: https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet You should build it using the setup.py script and not in the IDE. There are CI builds setup for both windows and linux (see README.md) if you want to see exactly how the wheel gets bu

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-03 Thread Bradley Friedman
Can you provide the contents of the ".Config" file that is built with your particular build solution? There's a pretty good chance that the "FileNotFound" is actually mono trying to link back to Python shared libraries. Though to be honest, debugging is going to be your best bet here. You mig

Re: [Python.NET] homebrew pythonnet, versus pip install --pre pythonnet

2014-06-03 Thread Tribble, Brett
It has been a while since I've had to deal with this, but make sure that your assembly is in the system path and/or pythonpath if it is not registered in the GAC. From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+btribble=ea@python.org] On Behalf Of Adam Klein Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 4:0