Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jan 3, 2005, at 11:58 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
Okay. At some point, that symlink got blown away on my machine, so I
put in the install-*lib entries.
If that symlink got blown away, /Library/Python/2.3 shouldn't have ended
up in sys.path (unless you jigger that in elsewhere
On Jan 3, 2005, at 11:58 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
Bob Ippolito wrote:
Do this instead:
# Begin File
[install]
install-scripts=/usr/local/bin
install-data=/usr/local/share
# End File
Screwing with purelib and platlib is a terrible idea if you ever have
multiple versions of Python installed, because t
Bob Ippolito wrote:
Do this instead:
# Begin File
[install]
install-scripts=/usr/local/bin
install-data=/usr/local/share
# End File
Screwing with purelib and platlib is a terrible idea if you ever have
multiple versions of Python installed, because they will all use the
same .pydistutils.cfg. Th
On Jan 3, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas on how I can get pychecker to work?
Create a file in your home directory called .pydistutils.cfg (yes, the
first dot is important).
Put the following text (between the two #-comment lines) into it:
# Beg
On Jan 2, 2005, at 11:16 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
[Bob Ippolito]
However, it is our (in the "I know you use Windows but I am not the
only
one that uses Mac OS X sense) problem so long as Darwin is a supported
platform, because it is highly unlikely that Apple will backport any
"fix" to
the allocato
Coming late to this thread.
I don't see the point of lying awake at night worrying about potential
memory losses unless you've heard someone complain about it. As Tim
has been trying to explain, here are plenty of other things in Python
that we *could* speed up if there was a need; since every spe
Mike Hansen wrote:
I'm having trouble getting pychecker to work in OS X 10.3.7
I installed it and don't recall seeing any error messages.
In the terminal when I type
pychecker myprogram.py
-bash: pychecker: command not found
I noticed in the pythonmac faq, it mentioned that many disutils packages
I'm having trouble getting pychecker to work in OS X 10.3.7
I installed it and don't recall seeing any error messages.
In the terminal when I type
pychecker myprogram.py
-bash: pychecker: command not found
I noticed in the pythonmac faq, it mentioned that many disutils packages
install into /Syste
[Bob Ippolito]
> ...
> What about for list objects that are big at some point, then
> progressively shrink, but happen to stick around for a while? An
> "event queue" that got clogged for some reason and then became stable?
It's less plausible that we''re going to see a lot of these
simultaneousl
On Jan 3, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Peters]
Ya, I understood that. My conclusion was that Darwin's realloc()
implementation isn't production-quality. So it goes.
[Bob Ippolito]
Whatever that means.
Well, it means what it said. The C standard says nothing about
performance metrics
[Tim Peters]
>> Ya, I understood that. My conclusion was that Darwin's realloc()
>> implementation isn't production-quality. So it goes.
[Bob Ippolito]
> Whatever that means.
Well, it means what it said. The C standard says nothing about
performance metrics of any kind, and a production-qualit
Has anyone had problems with installing and using matplotlib under OS X?
I've tried installing the last couple of versions and while
installation goes smoothly it crashes when I try to import from pylab,
as shown below
>>> from pylab import *
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line
On Jan 3, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Coming late to this thread.
I don't see the point of lying awake at night worrying about potential
memory losses unless you've heard someone complain about it. As Tim
has been trying to explain, here are plenty of other things in Python
that we *
Folks,
I have a first version of the next "MacPython additions for 10.3"
available. Please give it a try, including test-driving the Package
Manager (which has gone up to version 0.5, and has had all the packages
updated to newer versions).
Report here with any problems you find, and also if
On Jan 3, 2005, at 2:16 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
[Bob Ippolito]
...
Your expectation is not correct for Darwin's memory allocation scheme.
It seems that Darwin creates allocations of immutable size. The only
way ANY part of an allocation will ever be used by ANYTHING else is if
free() is called with
[Bob Ippolito]
> ...
> Your expectation is not correct for Darwin's memory allocation scheme.
> It seems that Darwin creates allocations of immutable size. The only
> way ANY part of an allocation will ever be used by ANYTHING else is if
> free() is called with that allocation.
Ya, I understood t
[Bob Ippolito]
> Quite a few notable places in the Python sources expect realloc(...) to
> relinquish some memory if the requested size is smaller than the
> currently allocated size.
I don't know what "relinquish some memory" means. If it means
something like "returns memory to the OS, so that t
17 matches
Mail list logo
