Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 23:52, OpenMacNews wrote:
Foundation is its own framework (see /System/Library/Frameworks)
yup.
which is implicitly linked in by Cocoa and Carbon.
Actually no, Carbon doesn't link to Foundation. Everything written in
Objective-C does, though. You're proba
On Apr 3, 2005, at 23:52, OpenMacNews wrote:
Foundation is its own framework (see /System/Library/Frameworks)
yup.
which is implicitly linked in by Cocoa and Carbon.
Actually no, Carbon doesn't link to Foundation. Everything written in
Objective-C does, though. You're probably thinking of CoreFo
On Apr 3, 2005, at 23:23, OpenMacNews wrote:
*something's* expecting libxml2 to be there ...
I'll bet that it's either Cocoa or Carbon. In that case, you
definitely
*don't* want it to use your own libxml2.
makes possible sense in that there's a reference to 'Foundation',
which given your suspicio
robert,
Foundation is its own framework (see /System/Library/Frameworks)
yup.
which is implicitly linked in by Cocoa and Carbon.
sigh. more to learn. =-)
clearly time to unpack & actually read my new copy of Hillegass' book ...
which, iiuc, would suggest no dependence whatsoever on libxml -- eithe
OpenMacNews wrote:
hi robert,
*something's* expecting libxml2 to be there ...
I'll bet that it's either Cocoa or Carbon. In that case, you definitely
*don't* want it to use your own libxml2.
makes possible sense in that there's a reference to 'Foundation', which
given your suspicion, refers to t
Well Bob - I decided to install your 2.4.1 before I get to a point
where I could screw up something important :~) In an initial pass
through my learning project, all worked well so far. The only thing I
had to do was copy my localized package .pth file to a new folder
~/Library/Python/2.4/s
hi robert,
*something's* expecting libxml2 to be there ...
I'll bet that it's either Cocoa or Carbon. In that case, you definitely
*don't* want it to use your own libxml2.
makes possible sense in that there's a reference to 'Foundation', which given
your suspicion, refers to the OSX FoundationClas
OpenMacNews wrote:
/Volumes/Projects/ports/Python-2.4.1/Mac/OSX/PythonLauncher/build/Pytho
nLauncher.build/PythonLauncher.build/Objects-normal/LinkFileList
"-arch" "ppc" "-s" "-prebind" "-Wl,-no_arch_warnings" "-framework"
"Cocoa" "-framework" "Carbon"
ld: warning prebindi
hi bob,
no matter what i do, the build links against the 'native'
/usr/lib/libxml* ... successful w/ no error, just the 'wrong' lib.
Neither Python itself, nor any extension in the standard library, links to
libxml.
well, that's good -- & at least consistent with why there's no significant
refer
On Apr 3, 2005, at 21:48, Robert Kern wrote:
Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 21:03, Robert Kern wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of MacEnthon 0.0!
MacEnthon is the OS X counterpart to the popular "Enthought Edition"
of Python: a convenient bundling of a number of packages ge
hi all,
i've originally posted this on python-list -- but I have a suspicion my
questions may have to do with Mac-specific issues, so I'll try here as well ...
i've successfully built Python-2.4.1 from src on OSX 10.3.8 as a framework
install with, simply:
./configure \
--enable-framework
Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 21:03, Robert Kern wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of MacEnthon 0.0!
MacEnthon is the OS X counterpart to the popular "Enthought Edition"
of Python: a convenient bundling of a number of packages geared for
the scientific community. Right now
On Apr 3, 2005, at 21:03, Robert Kern wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of MacEnthon 0.0!
MacEnthon is the OS X counterpart to the popular "Enthought Edition"
of Python: a convenient bundling of a number of packages geared for
the scientific community. Right now, it targets the App
On Apr 3, 2005, at 21:03, OpenMacNews wrote:
i've originally posted this on python-list -- but I have a suspicion
my questions may have to do with Mac-specific issues, so I'll try here
as well ...
i've successfully built Python-2.4.1 from src on OSX 10.3.8 as a
framework install with, simply:
Robert Kern wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of MacEnthon 0.0!
I should add that the disk image is 158 MiB large and that the installed
files take up... I'm not actually sure, but it's under 700 MiB, I believe.
Zip archives of individual packages will be available when I get aroun
I am pleased to announce the availability of MacEnthon 0.0!
MacEnthon is the OS X counterpart to the popular "Enthought Edition" of
Python: a convenient bundling of a number of packages geared for the
scientific community. Right now, it targets the Apple-installed Python
2.3.0. Once I am satisfi
On 24-mrt-05, at 14:28, Steve Spicklemire wrote:
Hi Folks,
Back in the pretty old days (python 1.5 or so I think) I developed a
Macromedia Director (MMD) scripting Xtra that allowed Lingo scripts to
use python as an embedded language. It worked great... but I moved on
and haven't done anything C
On Apr 3, 2005, at 5:31 PM, John Hunter wrote:
Bob> Then either it's a bug in readline, or you have some kind of
Bob> local configuration problem. If you search around the Fink
Bob> project and find out that they're applying any patches, let
Bob> me know and I'll see if I can do so
Bob> Then either it's a bug in readline, or you have some kind of
Bob> local configuration problem. If you search around the Fink
Bob> project and find out that they're applying any patches, let
Bob> me know and I'll see if I can do something, but I'm not going
Bob> to researc
A bug perhaps?
Poking around some more I think I see now what was happening.
distutils is not automagically copying the swig generated arith.py
unless it is there from a previous build (residue).
After deleting all residue so that it looks like a 1st time build
If I attempt a build and inst
On Apr 3, 2005, at 5:19 AM, Larry Bugbee wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 4:12 AM, Larry Bugbee wrote:
I'm stuck. I'm trying to make a Python extension from some
relatively simple code written in C. I created a setup.py and built
the module. Upon impor
Thanks Bob! ...that combined with arith.py not being copied to
site-package.
Which raises another question, ought not arith.py be copied and if so,
a bug?
Anyway, much appreciated. I'm off and running again. Thanks.
Larry
On Apr 3, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 4:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 4:12 AM, Larry Bugbee wrote:
I'm stuck. I'm trying to make a Python extension from some relatively
simple code written in C. I created a setup.py and built the module.
Upon importing, I keep getting an ImportError. I built and got the
same error with both python 2.3 and 2.
I'm stuck. I'm trying to make a Python extension from some relatively
simple code written in C. I created a setup.py and built the module.
Upon importing, I keep getting an ImportError. I built and got the
same error with both python 2.3 and 2.4.1. (I am running 10.3.8. swig
is 1.3.24. g
24 matches
Mail list logo