Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-02-01 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 2-feb-2006, at 2:16, Bob Ippolito wrote: From my Makefile.pre.in: -- This is very ugly. As you have noted you can't just drop -arch ppc because libtool than assumes that you want to do a 3-way universal build. Probably because libSystem contains a ppc64 binary. I hope to have a scrip

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

2006-02-01 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 27-jan-2006, at 16:38, bear wrote: > >> Ronald Oussoren wrote: >>> >>> On 27-jan-2006, at 4:22, bear wrote: >>> Ronald Oussoren wrote: > That part is easy enough. If you want a framework build you'll > have to patch Makefil

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python and eggs and bdist_mpkg and ...

2006-02-01 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 1-feb-2006, at 17:29, Andrew Jaffe wrote: Hi All, On a related note, is there a 'best' way to install python packages on a mac nowadays? It seems that there at least three possibilities: - plain old setup.py install - bdist_mpkg - eggs I've been using bdist_mpkg a lot recently, bu

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python and eggs and bdist_mpkg and ...

2006-02-01 Thread Andrew Jaffe
Hi All, On a related note, is there a 'best' way to install python packages on a mac nowadays? It seems that there at least three possibilities: - plain old setup.py install - bdist_mpkg - eggs I've been using bdist_mpkg a lot recently, but this discussion is making me think it may not the