Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Creating Installer for my py2app-generated bundle

Thanks for the other thoughts of alternative approaches, but I've elected to go the installer route as it flows most naturally for me and this application. I figured out how to automate PackageMaker: silly me, I thought that because I'd used py2app I'd need some python-based solution for gettin

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Creating Installer for my py2app-generated bundle

Paul McNett wrote: Kevin Walzer wrote: Paul McNett wrote: Hi, I've successfully created my application bundle (a wxPython-based application) using py2app and now I want to create an installer inside a compressed dmg. I'm having trouble finding examples of how to do this. I've tried runnin

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Creating Installer for my py2app-generated bundle

Kevin Walzer wrote: Paul McNett wrote: Hi, I've successfully created my application bundle (a wxPython-based application) using py2app and now I want to create an installer inside a compressed dmg. I'm having trouble finding examples of how to do this. I've tried running bdist_mpkg which s

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Creating Installer for my py2app-generated bundle

Paul McNett wrote: Hi, I've successfully created my application bundle (a wxPython-based application) using py2app and now I want to create an installer inside a compressed dmg. I'm having trouble finding examples of how to do this. I've tried running bdist_mpkg which seems to result in a n

[Pythonmac-SIG] Creating Installer for my py2app-generated bundle

Hi, I've successfully created my application bundle (a wxPython-based application) using py2app and now I want to create an installer inside a compressed dmg. I'm having trouble finding examples of how to do this. I've tried running bdist_mpkg which seems to result in a nearly empty package.

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Am 2008-10-22 um 21:54 schrieb Joe Strout: I suppose I should really move this to the pyXide list. I had to google that (and it take a couple of tries to find the relevant link). For the record, this is what I found: ...which sounds like a pretty interesting id

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

On Oct 22, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: Here are my issues, relating to the list I sent earlier about Peppy: (several valid points, mostly about Editra's handling of multiple languages) I'm not so concerned about handling of multiple languages, as I don't intend to use it

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Christopher Barker wrote: Joe Strout wrote: FYI, I've been most impressed so far with Editra. I'll need to take a look again and see why I rejected it in favor of Peppy -- I honestly don't remember. OK, I've taken a look again: First, it really is nicely put together, polished and packaged

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Brendan Simons wrote: I like textwrangler. So do I, for a lot of things, but one thing that really bugs me is that it simply does not do code indentation properly. In fact, IIRC, there was a thread about this quite some years ago, in which someone (was it you, Joe?) posted a note back from B

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Joe Strout wrote: On Oct 22, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Brendan Simons wrote: I'll offer a counter opinion to say that I quite like Komodo. I appreciate the input. However, I have to admit a bias towards an IDE actually written in Python, for several reasons. Most of the logic in Komodo is written

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

On Oct 22, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Brendan Simons wrote: I'll offer a counter opinion to say that I quite like Komodo. I appreciate the input. However, I have to admit a bias towards an IDE actually written in Python, for several reasons. If you can live with just text highlighting and the abil

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

I'll offer a counter opinion to say that I quite like Komodo. If you can live with just text highlighting and the ability to run scripts from the editor, I like textwrangler. -- Brendan Simons __ Be smarter than spam. See