On 6 Nov, 2009, at 23:55, Kevin Walzer wrote:
On 11/6/09 11:27 AM, Brian Zambrano wrote:
Hi there,
I'm building an app with py2app and it runs successfully both on my
computer and a friends. We both have the developer tools installed. On
two other Macs, the application would die when
On 2 Nov, 2009, at 20:10, Christopher Barker wrote:
Hi folks,
For a while now, PIL has provided a proper package, so that you can do:
from PIL import Image
rather than relying on a pth file and:
import Image
I'm such a fanatic about proper use of packages and namespaces that I
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
I will commit this patch once py2apps repository gets back (I have connectivity
problems to the repo at the moment)
great, thanks.
I don't know, I don't even know which name is the preferred one.
I'm clear on that -- every package has moved to using namespaces over
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com wrote:
I don't know, I don't even know which name is the preferred one. The
PIL Handbook
(http://www.pythonware.com/library/pil/handbook/index.htm) uses
'import Image' throughout.
Note that the on-line PIL handbook is from 4.5 years ago.
Bill
On 24 Nov, 2009, at 20:27, Bill Janssen wrote:
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com wrote:
I don't know, I don't even know which name is the preferred one. The
PIL Handbook
(http://www.pythonware.com/library/pil/handbook/index.htm) uses
'import Image' throughout.
Note that the
On 24 Nov, 2009, at 20:06, Christopher Barker wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
I will commit this patch once py2apps repository gets back (I have
connectivity problems to the repo at the moment)
great, thanks.
The patch is in the repo.
I don't know, I don't even know which name is the
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
No harm in having both ways, though.
I'm not 100% sure about that though, users may now end up with two copies of
PIL unless they remove the .pth file as well. That wouldn't be a disaster, but
I'd prefer to avoid that.
hmm -- I suppose we should check that. I
Hi all,
Just checked in rev. 69 which contains a couple of 64-bit bug fixes along with
a workaround for OS 10.6's return ID bug. Unfortunately, I don't have time to
do a thorough test, particularly of 32- and 64-bit support on Python 3.1.1 (the
python.org framework distro is 32-bit only), and
In article 8773f3ac-0873-47f6-9587-07a1e114d...@virgin.net,
has hengist.p...@virgin.net wrote:
Just checked in rev. 69 which contains a couple of 64-bit bug fixes along
with a workaround for OS 10.6's return ID bug. Unfortunately, I don't have
time to do a thorough test, particularly of 32-
In article nad-b5e15d.17343224112...@news.gmane.org,
Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
Same results with the python.org 2.6.4 on this machine either via
setuptools easy_install or direct python setup.py install.
Sorry, I overlooked the fact that the 2.6.4 traceback is a little more
informative
10 matches
Mail list logo
