On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael McCracken
wrote:
> That makes sense - but as you mention, it seems like there's some
> missing functionality.
I think so, yes, but it can get the job done.
> However, it's no fun if you have a lot of subpackages to add that way.
nope -- but for the most
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael McCracken
> wrote:
>
>> That makes sense - but as you mention, it seems like there's some
>> missing functionality.
>
> I think so, yes, but it can get the job done.
>
>> However, it's no fun if you h
On 18 Jul, 2012, at 0:25, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>
> It's a big ugly, but I've managed to put packages into the zip with
> something like this:
>
> includes = ["package",
>"package.subpackage"
>"package.subpackage.module1"
>"package.subpackage.modu
On 18 Jul, 2012, at 4:48, Mark Livingstone wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> I Played a but further…
>
> With a bit of terminal foo, I changed to the Apple python. I blew away
> DIST & Build and tried again. What I found is that because the EPD
> directories were still at the beginning of my path, it sti
