In article ,
Ned Deily wrote:
[...]
> I've just commented on this in more detail on the pip issue tracker:
>
> https://github.com/pypa/pip/pip/pull/1465
er, https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/1465
--
Ned Deily,
n...@acm.org
___
Pythonmac-SIG mailli
In article
,
Chris Barker wrote:
> The numpy folks are trying hard to get binary wheel sup on PyPi yeah!
>
> But this brought hup an issue -- PyPI policy is that binary wheels should
> be built for the python.org binaries -- which is great.
[...]
> So is it officially supported to link a *.so
The numpy folks are trying hard to get binary wheel sup on PyPi yeah!
But this brought hup an issue -- PyPI policy is that binary wheels should
be built for the python.org binaries -- which is great.
The Python.org binaries are built for >=10.6, 32+64 bit Intel, and have the
platfrom name:
10_6_
