> On 10 Jan 2017, at 20:43, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>
>> On 10 Jan 2017, at 17:05, Jack Jansen wrote:
>>
>> I have completely ignored this whole TLS 1.0 versus TLS 1.2 security debate
>> until know, but just now the following post came in on python-announce,
>> which seems to suggest that
> On 10 Jan 2017, at 17:05, Jack Jansen wrote:
>
> I have completely ignored this whole TLS 1.0 versus TLS 1.2 security debate
> until know, but just now the following post came in on python-announce, which
> seems to suggest that TLS 1.0 is really about to be phased out:
> https://mail.pytho
> On 10 Jan 2017, at 17:00, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> Ronald,
>
> Attached is a patch that cleans up the false positives by allows the recipes
> to tell build_app what is expected to be missing.
>
> I can turn into a pull request if you like the direction of this patch.
I like the idea.. A pull
Ronald,
Attached is a patch that cleans up the false positives by allows the recipes to
tell build_app what is expected to be missing.
I can turn into a pull request if you like the direction of this patch.
Oh and the syntax errors in PyQt5 have been fixes for the 5.7.1 version.
Barry
py2app
I have completely ignored this whole TLS 1.0 versus TLS 1.2 security debate
until know, but just now the following post came in on python-announce, which
seems to suggest that TLS 1.0 is really about to be phased out:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-announce-list/2017-January/011437.htm
