On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 9 Jun, 2008, at 12:07, Charlie Moad wrote:
>
>
>> I think the
>> best way to move forward is to just post binaries for each architecture
>> and not have a universal bui
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Charlie Moad wrote:
>
>>best way to move forward is to just post binaries for each
>>architecture and not have a universal build.
>>Please, Please, Please, NO!
>>
>
>
> I think the
>
>> best way to move forward is to just post binaries for each architecture
>> and not have a universal build.
>>
>
> Please, Please, Please, NO!
This seems to be the only solution to make "easy_install matplotlib"
actually work.
>
> I really think it is very, very important
On 10/10/06, R. Padraic Springuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't tried the binaries because there isn't one for python 2.5 and
> Mac OS 10.4 (the particular combination that I have). I could use the
> binaries if I went back to python 2.4, but I'm trying avoid that if
> possible.
So actua
Hi,
Could you please add this scipy-0.5.1 build to the listing? It
is compatible with the latest mpl and numpy additions.
http://euclid.uits.iupui.edu/mplfiles/scipy-0.5.1-py2.4-macosx10.4.mpkg.zip
http://euclid.uits.iupui.edu/mplfiles/scipy-0.5.1-py2.4-macosx-10.4-fat.egg
Thanks,
Char
Could you please update the py24-fat listing with the latest matplotlib build?
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80706&package_id=82474&release_id=431354
Thanks,
Charlie
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
h
On 7/14/06, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Kebinger wrote:
> > Thanks for responding. Every library I'm using came prebuild from
> > http://www.pythonmac.or/packages/py24-fat/index.html. I don't know who
> > built them or when.
>
> Nor do I, but I'm having the same problem as
On 7/14/06, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on Building a Matplotlib that will work with the Universal
> Python.
>
> I was going along just fine, following the procedure that I've used
> before, but low and behold, I've run into a problem.
>
> MPL Requires li
On 7/3/06, Russell E. Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to build on a PPC MacOS X 10.3.9 system using Python 2.4.1,
> but "import pylab" gives a bus error. (This is for a python app I
> distribute, so I can't give up on 10.3.9 yet. Once I solve this problem
> then I can redo it with stat
; matplotlib version 0.87.2
> verbose.level helpful
> interactive is False
> platform is darwin
>
> Anybody have any ideas what is happening?
>
> On 03 May, 2006, at 20:09, Charlie Moad wrote:
>
> > I posted a universal build of matplotlib 0.87.2 on sourceforge in
I posted a universal build of matplotlib 0.87.2 on sourceforge in
egg and mpkg format. It is compiled against the latest numarray,
numpy, and Numeric as well as Tk and the new wxPython-rc2 universal.
Libpng and freetype2 are statically linked in. Please post or link to
either/both at "http:
On 4/18/06, kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2006, at 21:59, Advertising Department wrote:
>
> > (I'm totally confused about the nine versions of python for Mac OS X,
> > the defunct or just not updated for 2 years MacPython pages, the
> > current state of the macintosh specific librar
On 3/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does matplotlib work with AquaTerm as a backend?
Recently an AquaTerm backend was donated to matplotlib. I haven't had
a chance to test or commit it to svn yet though. I am attaching it
for anyone interested.
- Charlie
"""
An AquaTerm b
> Which said that it worked, but I couldn't find the easy_install script
> anywhere. Afer much floundering, I finally figured out that it put it in:
>
> /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/bin
>
> which is not on my $PATH. Should it be? or should there be links to
> those scripts in /
> > No, you didn't misinterpret my post, but according to Bob, you could
> > easily upload the eggs directly to cheeseshop -- why not do that?
>
> Because he's not finished testing it, yet? These particular packages are
> somewhat complicated and only recently have been eggified.
Technically becau
On 1/23/06, Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 6:50 PM, Charlie Moad wrote:
>
> >>> Yes, the egg itself gets hosted on Cheese Shop, as well as the
> >>> source
> >>> download (hence the "upload").
> &
> > Yes, the egg itself gets hosted on Cheese Shop, as well as the source
> > download (hence the "upload").
> >
> > The packages you often use are not yet using setuptools,
>
> Do you know of a package I can find on cheeseshop that is using
> setuptools? I'd like to get a sense of what features th
The error is an incompatibility with python2.4's distutils I believe.
I have yet to see a patch though. I personally just get the contents
of the build since it completes successfully. I know, this probably
won't help for packaging. It would be nice if someone know of a patch
out there.
On 10/
18 matches
Mail list logo
