Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-17 Thread Jack Jansen
On 10-feb-05, at 20:56, Michael Hudson wrote: Michael Maibaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: As for Python. As soon as there is a framework version of Python that can be installed via a destroot for packaging, I'll add it to DarwinPorts. Or if someone can figure out how to hack the current version to

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-10 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 10, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Michael Hudson wrote: Michael Maibaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: As for Python. As soon as there is a framework version of Python that can be installed via a destroot for packaging, I'll add it to DarwinPorts. Or if someone can figure out how to hack the current versio

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-10 Thread Michael Hudson
Michael Maibaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As for Python. As soon as there is a framework version of Python > that can be installed via a destroot for packaging, I'll add it to > DarwinPorts. Or if someone can figure out how to hack the current > version to do it... Is there a bug report for t

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-10 Thread Michael Maibaum
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:37:01AM -0800, Chris Barker wrote: Michael Maibaum wrote: FWIW, DarwinPorts has 'aqua' variants of many packages, cool. I'll have to look into which ones, thought I'll start with a question: wxPython? X11 - wxWidgets and wxWindows in dports build aqua by default, but py

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-10 Thread Chris Barker
Michael Maibaum wrote: FWIW, DarwinPorts has 'aqua' variants of many packages, cool. I'll have to look into which ones, thought I'll start with a question: wxPython? > and if you want them for something that doesn't have one, either add the variant and send off the patch, or make a request. As

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-10 Thread Michael Maibaum
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:57:05AM -0800, Chris Barker wrote: Bob Ippolito wrote: On 8-feb-05, at 15:51, Brendan Simons wrote: My question: can I use py2app to build a redistributable app that's statically linked to either package manager's libraries? Or do I have to install Fink/DarwinPorts on e

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Robert Kern
Chris Barker wrote: I really think we can get a complete set of OS-X friendly packages out for all to use. it's really not all that hard, once you've got the tricks figured out. We'll have a MUCH easier time getting folks to use python on OS-X if we have nice friendly binaries for them to instal

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 8, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Chris Barker wrote: Bob Ippolito wrote: Mine is not. I'm going to toss it in favor of a mpkg and/or egg based solution when one is ready. Sounds good to me. I've always thought that you need to make it easy, but not too easy. Years ago, someone hosted a "python on Lin

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Chris Barker
Bob Ippolito wrote: Mine is not. I'm going to toss it in favor of a mpkg and/or egg based solution when one is ready. Sounds good to me. I've always thought that you need to make it easy, but not too easy. Years ago, someone hosted a "python on Linux" site, that had nothing but a bunch of rpm o

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Charles Hartman
On Feb 8, 2005, at 2:50 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: My impression of fink (and darwinports may be different, I'll be checking that out) is that it's kind of an all-or-nothing proposition. If you want a Linux-like system, running in parallel to OS-X, on the same kernel, you'll be quite happy. If you

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 8, 2005, at 12:57, Chris Barker wrote: Bob Ippolito wrote: On 8-feb-05, at 15:51, Brendan Simons wrote: My question: can I use py2app to build a redistributable app that's statically linked to either package manager's libraries? Or do I have to install Fink/DarwinPorts on each of my client

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Chris Barker
Bob Ippolito wrote: On 8-feb-05, at 15:51, Brendan Simons wrote: My question: can I use py2app to build a redistributable app that's statically linked to either package manager's libraries? Or do I have to install Fink/DarwinPorts on each of my clients' machines? If you are distributing a single

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 8, 2005, at 10:35, Ronald Oussoren wrote: On 8-feb-05, at 15:51, Brendan Simons wrote: The conversation about Fink & Darwinports has introduced me to linuxy package managers for the first time, and I have to say, this looks much easier than trying to compile libraries and manage dependencies

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 8-feb-05, at 15:51, Brendan Simons wrote: The conversation about Fink & Darwinports has introduced me to linuxy package managers for the first time, and I have to say, this looks much easier than trying to compile libraries and manage dependencies myself. My question: can I use py2app to build

[Pythonmac-SIG] Fink, DarwinPorts vs py2app

2005-02-08 Thread Brendan Simons
The conversation about Fink & Darwinports has introduced me to linuxy package managers for the first time, and I have to say, this looks much easier than trying to compile libraries and manage dependencies myself. My question: can I use py2app to build a redistributable app that's statically link