On Apr 22, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
...
> cc -arch ppc -arch i386 -Wl,-syslibroot,/Developer/SDKs/
> MacOSX10.4u.sdk -o static static.o -L. -lanswer
...
> /usr/bin/ld: for architecture ppc
> /usr/bin/ld: warning static.o cputype (7, architecture i386) does
> not match cputyp
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
...
> On other platforms I'd say that gmp should be compiled with -fPIC
> in the compiler flags. On OSX however this
That's one of the things I tried (adding CFLAGS=-fPIC to the ./
configure invocation), uselessly.
> should be the defaul
On Apr 22, 2006, at 14:51, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
>...
>> So the answer, IMHO and I could be wrong since I am very new to
>> this, is one of two choices:
>> 1) use 'ld' to produce two separate builds and then use 'lipo' to
>> weld them tog
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
...
> So the answer, IMHO and I could be wrong since I am very new to
> this, is one of two choices:
> 1) use 'ld' to produce two separate builds and then use 'lipo' to
> weld them together as a 'FAT' dylib or
> 2) To use 'cc' to build the dy
On Apr 22, 2006, at 12:36, Alex Martelli wrote:
> It's not just gmpy, but anything that needs to be linked as -
> bundle, whatever that means exactly. The workings of ld are
> slightly arcane -- I did already ask for advice from colleagues who
> I thought SHOULD know; for example, Matt Auste
On 22-apr-2006, at 18:50, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
> Once this idiocy is solved, there is another problem: I STILL can't
> link gmpy.so beause I can't make libgmp.a to build properly for
> linkage into a -bundle. Specifically (with gmpy.sf.net's current CVS
> contents):
>
> brain:~/alex/gmpy alex
On Apr 22, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Daniel Lord wrote:
...
>> Apple's assembly syntax is totally irrelevant here. The reason make
>> check fails is Apple's creative *ld semantics*: an object file inside
>> a library file is NOT brought in if the only symbols it satisfies are
>> DATA ones.
...
>
On Apr 22, 2006, at 9:50, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>> And GMP doesn't compile on Mac-tel and won't for some time:
>>
>> The current release is 4.2, released 2006-03-26. It fixes all bugs
>> found in 4.1.4, as well as several portability problems. It also
>> adds several new features. Note that we ch
On Apr 22, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
> A new edition of the Nutshell? That is great news! That's the book
> I go back to, out of a dozen I've got, most often. Updated for 2.5
> perhaps?
Focused on 2.4 (and pointing out what 2.4 added to 2.3, so that by
subtraction it should
A new edition of the Nutshell? That is great news! That's the book I go back to, out of a dozen I've got, most often. Updated for 2.5 perhaps?Charles HartmanOn Apr 22, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Alex Martelli wrote:Then, I had the deadline for the 2nd ed of the Nutshell, then a week's vacation at the Gra
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No arbitrary precison math on Mac-tel say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
> The analog of a single gene pool in nature has come to pass for
> arbitrary precison math (APM) for OS X (native not Python).
> GMP is 'it' for APM as far as I can t
On Apr 21, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Daniel Lord wrote:
> The analog of a single gene pool in nature has come to pass for
> arbitrary precison math (APM) for OS X (native not Python).
> GMP is 'it' for APM as far as I can tell unless I want to write my
> own.
> And GMP doesn't compile on Mac-tel and
The analog of a single gene pool in nature has come to pass for arbitrary precison math (APM) for OS X (native not Python).GMP is 'it' for APM as far as I can tell unless I want to write my own.And GMP doesn't compile on Mac-tel and won't for some time:The current release is 4.2, released 2006-03-2
13 matches
Mail list logo
