Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Please test PIL package on OS-X

2008-05-02 Thread William Kyngesburye
On May 2, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: William Kyngesburye wrote: Quick import test works. good start -- could you run that test script? you pass in a *.jpg on the command line, and it makes a copy with a watermark printed on it. That tests the jpeg driver and the freetype

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Please test PIL package on OS-X

2008-05-02 Thread Christopher Barker
William Kyngesburye wrote: Quick import test works. good start -- could you run that test script? you pass in a *.jpg on the command line, and it makes a copy with a watermark printed on it. That tests the jpeg driver and the freetype implementation. I haven't built a python extension insta

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Please test PIL package on OS-X

2008-05-02 Thread William Kyngesburye
On May 2, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: The motivation for this is that the dependencies are otherwise very tricky to build correctly for Universal python builds. ...and are already installed and used by many GIS users (Qgis, GDAL, GRASS, MapServer), who may also want to use

[Pythonmac-SIG] Please test PIL package on OS-X

2008-05-02 Thread Christopher Barker
Hi all, I've been experimenting with building PIL for OS-X in a new way, providing the dependencies through William Kyngesburye's Unix Compatability frameworks: http://www.kyngchaos.com/wiki/software:frameworks See earlier posts on the MacPython lists for details. The short version is that